From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10660 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2000 16:54:44 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Jul 2000 16:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 5866 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2000 16:54:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12302 Received: (qmail 5859 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2000 16:54:33 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: hoser.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to teg@redhat.com using -f Sender: teg@hoser.devel.redhat.com To: "Bart Schaefer" Cc: Zefram , zsh workers mailing list Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: adding a toplevel zsh.spec.in file References: <1000718052255.ZM22950@candle.brasslantern.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?=) Date: 18 Jul 2000 12:54:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2000 05:22:55 +0000" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit "Bart Schaefer" writes: > A good example of this is the RedHat umask setting that Adam and I were > just discussing. Since RedHat made the decision to put every user in > a separate group -- something that baffles me to this day; maybe Trond > is reading this and knows the reasoning http://www.redhat.com/support/manuals/RHL-6.2-Manual/ref-guide/s1-sysadmin-usr-grps.html#S2-SYSADMIN-PRIV-GROUPS -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.