From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes To: mason@primenet.com.au Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: List archive not tracking new home site? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Karsten Thygesen Date: 27 Jan 1999 15:39:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: mason@primenet.com.au's message of "27 Jan 1999 10:06:05 GMT" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.44/Emacs 20.3 X-Mailing-List: 5063 >>>>> "Geoff" == Geoff Wing writes: Geoff> Well, you can only do this if you subscribe workers to users Geoff> and users to announce. If a message to users gets ezmlm-send'd Geoff> to workers (as it obviously is now) then people in workers are Geoff> not going to get a X-Seq-users added. Well, they can have it Geoff> added but the sequence number won't point to the correct users Geoff> sequence number. No - now that I give it a second thought, you are right. Geoff> :That way, forwarded messages will contain all (possible) Geoff> sequence :numbers, and intelligent archive software could even Geoff> use this to :crosslink between the lists. Geoff> Ah, now where do I get this intelligent archive software :-) It was just a thought :-) Anyway - what other solutions can we come up with? Is there anybody or anything besides the mail archive that uses the sequence numbers to anything? If there is not, I would assume, that the archive could invent it's own numbering scheme which is unrelated to the X-Seq numbers, subscribe to all 3 lists and then make some filtering taking Message-ID into account (to find postings which have been posted to several of the lists). I do not consider it a great loose, that the two archives is not synchronized - I do not think, that anyone uses both of them. (or am I wrong?) Karsten