From: ori@eigenstate.org
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] Is 9front Generally Considered To Be The Successor To Plan9?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:11:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65F5E80D080E7A8D01FC5CCE71CC4FBB@eigenstate.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17101116980.dc049.73423@lsd.chicago.il.us>
Quoth Jay F. Shachter <jay@m5.chicago.il.us>:
>
> This is a 9front mailing list, to which Plan9 questions are routinely
> asked (e.g., "What is the Plan 9 equivalent of uname?").
>
> Is 9front widely considered to be the successor to Plan9, in the sense
> that, e.g., Fortran90 is the successor to Fortran77, such that answers
> descriptive of Fortran90 can be given to a question about "Fortran"?
Depends who's answering. Why do you care?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-10 23:01 Jay F. Shachter
2024-03-10 23:16 ` [9front] " Stanley Lieber
2024-03-10 23:26 ` Kurt H Maier
2024-03-11 0:11 ` ori [this message]
2024-03-11 9:57 ` hiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65F5E80D080E7A8D01FC5CCE71CC4FBB@eigenstate.org \
--to=ori@eigenstate.org \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).