* [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers @ 2020-12-17 15:08 Stephane Chazelas 2021-02-07 15:50 ` Stephane Chazelas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Stephane Chazelas @ 2020-12-17 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zsh hackers list $ zsh -c '[[ é = [[:IDENT:]] ]]' || echo no no $ zsh -o posixidentifiers -c '[[ é = [[:IDENT:]] ]]' && echo yes yes That should be the other way round. From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:49:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers wcsitype(c, IIDENT) should return false for non-ASCII characters when the POSIX_IDENTIFIERS option is on, not the other way round. --- Src/utils.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Src/utils.c b/Src/utils.c index 5151b89a8..2a8d677a7 100644 --- a/Src/utils.c +++ b/Src/utils.c @@ -4327,7 +4327,7 @@ wcsitype(wchar_t c, int itype) } else { switch (itype) { case IIDENT: - if (!isset(POSIXIDENTIFIERS)) + if (isset(POSIXIDENTIFIERS)) return 0; return iswalnum(c); -- 2.29.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2020-12-17 15:08 [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers Stephane Chazelas @ 2021-02-07 15:50 ` Stephane Chazelas 2021-02-07 20:24 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-03-22 17:17 ` Stephane Chazelas 0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Stephane Chazelas @ 2021-02-07 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zsh hackers list Ping. Anybody objecting to this? 2020-12-17 15:08:44 +0000, Stephane Chazelas: > $ zsh -c '[[ é = [[:IDENT:]] ]]' || echo no > no > $ zsh -o posixidentifiers -c '[[ é = [[:IDENT:]] ]]' && echo yes > yes > > That should be the other way round. > > > From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> > Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:49:50 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers > > wcsitype(c, IIDENT) should return false for non-ASCII characters > when the POSIX_IDENTIFIERS option is on, not the other way round. > --- > Src/utils.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Src/utils.c b/Src/utils.c > index 5151b89a8..2a8d677a7 100644 > --- a/Src/utils.c > +++ b/Src/utils.c > @@ -4327,7 +4327,7 @@ wcsitype(wchar_t c, int itype) > } else { > switch (itype) { > case IIDENT: > - if (!isset(POSIXIDENTIFIERS)) > + if (isset(POSIXIDENTIFIERS)) > return 0; > return iswalnum(c); > > -- > 2.29.2 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-02-07 15:50 ` Stephane Chazelas @ 2021-02-07 20:24 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-02-08 5:53 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-03-22 17:17 ` Stephane Chazelas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-02-07 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zsh hackers list On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 7:50 AM Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> wrote: > > Ping. Anybody objecting to this? Not I. We're behind on merging several patches, I think. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-02-07 20:24 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2021-02-08 5:53 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-02-08 20:51 ` Bart Schaefer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-02-08 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 12:24:26 -0800: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 7:50 AM Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> wrote: > > > > Ping. Anybody objecting to this? > > Not I. We're behind on merging several patches, I think. Do we need a patch manager? (See, for instance, https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/roles#patch-manager; tl;dr: someone who watches PATCH threads and pings them if they peter out unresolved — neither accepted nor rejected.) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-02-08 5:53 ` Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-02-08 20:51 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-02-09 9:11 ` Peter Stephenson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-02-08 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Shahaf; +Cc: zsh-workers On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 9:54 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > tl;dr: someone who watches PATCH threads and pings them if they peter out > unresolved — neither accepted nor rejected.) That would be nice. Peter/Oliver/I used to sort of tag-team that, but we have all run out of time/attention for it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-02-08 20:51 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2021-02-09 9:11 ` Peter Stephenson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Peter Stephenson @ 2021-02-09 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers > On 08 February 2021 at 20:51 Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 9:54 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > > > tl;dr: someone who watches PATCH threads and pings them if they peter out > > unresolved — neither accepted nor rejected.) > > That would be nice. Peter/Oliver/I used to sort of tag-team that, but > we have all run out of time/attention for it. Yes, I think attention is mostly the thing in my case. I do have the odd 5 minutes every now and then to apply and push patches if my brain has been sufficiently lit up. pws ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-02-07 15:50 ` Stephane Chazelas 2021-02-07 20:24 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2021-03-22 17:17 ` Stephane Chazelas 2021-03-22 23:45 ` Lawrence Velázquez 2021-03-23 5:34 ` [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers dana 1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Stephane Chazelas @ 2021-03-22 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zsh hackers list Ping again. Note that it's pretty straighforward, and I don't expect anyone would object to it. I also have a (much more involved and arguable) "limit" patch from last year which might be on someone's review queue. Maybe it would help to publish review queues on zsh.org (may as flat list of workers/1234 lines for each reviewer), so patch submitters can know whether or not the patch is being considered but reviewer are overwhelmed or it simply fell through the cracks. (in any case, I'm in no particular hurry for that (minor) bug to be fixed). Cheers, Stephane 2021-02-07 15:50:13 +0000, Stephane Chazelas: > Ping. Anybody objecting to this? > > 2020-12-17 15:08:44 +0000, Stephane Chazelas: > > $ zsh -c '[[ é = [[:IDENT:]] ]]' || echo no > > no > > $ zsh -o posixidentifiers -c '[[ é = [[:IDENT:]] ]]' && echo yes > > yes > > > > That should be the other way round. > > > > > > From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> > > Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:49:50 +0000 > > Subject: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers > > > > wcsitype(c, IIDENT) should return false for non-ASCII characters > > when the POSIX_IDENTIFIERS option is on, not the other way round. > > --- > > Src/utils.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Src/utils.c b/Src/utils.c > > index 5151b89a8..2a8d677a7 100644 > > --- a/Src/utils.c > > +++ b/Src/utils.c > > @@ -4327,7 +4327,7 @@ wcsitype(wchar_t c, int itype) > > } else { > > switch (itype) { > > case IIDENT: > > - if (!isset(POSIXIDENTIFIERS)) > > + if (isset(POSIXIDENTIFIERS)) > > return 0; > > return iswalnum(c); > > > > -- > > 2.29.2 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-03-22 17:17 ` Stephane Chazelas @ 2021-03-22 23:45 ` Lawrence Velázquez 2021-03-25 1:06 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-03-23 5:34 ` [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers dana 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-03-22 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephane Chazelas; +Cc: zsh-workers Hi Stephane, > On Mar 22, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> wrote: > > Maybe it would help to publish review queues on zsh.org (may as > flat list of workers/1234 lines for each reviewer), so patch > submitters can know whether or not the patch is being considered > but reviewer are overwhelmed or it simply fell through the cracks. My apologies, as patch manager I should have brought this to the list's attention, but I haven't worked back past mid-February yet. vq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-03-22 23:45 ` Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-03-25 1:06 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-03-28 1:48 ` Lawrence Velázquez 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-03-25 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lawrence Velázquez; +Cc: Stephane Chazelas, zsh-workers Lawrence Velázquez wrote on Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 19:45:59 -0400: > On Mar 22, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> wrote: > > Maybe it would help to publish review queues on zsh.org (may as > > flat list of workers/1234 lines for each reviewer), so patch > > submitters can know whether or not the patch is being considered > > but reviewer are overwhelmed or it simply fell through the cracks. I'm not sure that'd help. Once a task is listed on Alice's review queue, Bob will be less likely to review it. Also, other projects seem to solve the same problem without such a mechanism. I think it might be more effective to document something like "If you don't get a response after $N days, feel free to ping your patch" (for some concrete value of $N). > My apologies, as patch manager I should have brought this to the > list's attention, but I haven't worked back past mid-February yet. «~d '< 100d' ~b '^--- '» is my friend ☺ 20Dec16,08:33 Roman Perepelitsa Re: [BUG]: zle-line-pre-redraw breaks vi-repeat-change 20Dec17,15:08 Stephane Chazelas [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 20Dec18,13:18 Mikael Magnusson RFC PATCH: Sketch at :@ subscripting 20Dec23,23:47 Felipe Contreras [PATCH] declarednull: felipec's approach 20Dec28,22:13 Felipe Contreras [PATCH] declarednull: rename DECLARED to NULL 20Dec31,05:41 Felipe Contreras [PATCH 1/3] src: fix build warnings 20Dec31,05:41 Felipe Contreras [PATCH 2/3] autoconf: remove deprecated functions 20Dec31,05:41 Felipe Contreras [PATCH 3/3] autoconf: prepare for 2.70 21Jan04,00:22 brian m. carlson [PATCH v3 1/1] exec: run final pipeline command in a subshell in sh mode 21Jan12,22:42 Devin Hussey [PATCH] Ignore EACCES when doing non-pure globbing 21Jan13,03:04 Devin Hussey [PATCH] Allow globbing with unreadable parent directories 21Jan14,05:57 Bart Schaefer NO_CASE_GLOB and unreadable directories (Episode VI: A New Hope) 21Jan14,06:04 Lawrence Velázque [PATCH] Fix some documentation typos 21Jan14,18:56 Bart Schaefer Re: NO_CASE_GLOB and unreadable directories (Episode VI: A New Hope) 21Jan15,03:14 Peiyuan Song [PATCH] Make zpty module work in the cygwin and msys2 21Jan15,04:29 Peiyuan Song [PATCH v2] Make zpty module work in the cygwin and msys2 21Jan18,02:28 Peiyuan Song [PATCH v3] Make zpty module work in the cygwin and msys2 21Jan18,05:43 Jun T Re: [PATCH v3] Make zpty module work in the cygwin and msys2 21Jan19,08:44 Jun T Re: [PATCH v3] Make zpty module work in the cygwin and msys2 21Jan25,00:15 Bart Schaefer [PATCH] Tests for globbing below protected directories 21Jan25,08:16 Arseny Maslenniko [PATCH 1/2] promptinit: typo: RPOMPT -> RPROMPT 21Jan25,08:16 Arseny Maslenniko [PATCH 2/2] promptinit: Fix prompt cleanups 21Jan25,15:07 Peter Stephenson Re: Bug report: Completion for dynamically named dirs fails when $SUFFIX is not empty 21Jan28,07:36 Jun T [PATCH] _awk: support gawk ver. 5 21Jan28,09:40 Jacob Menke Re: Possible issue with Completion/Unix/Type/_date_formats return value 21Jan28,10:42 Jun T Re: Possible ZSH bug involving piping ls to less (MSYS2 & Cygwin) 21Jan29,19:35 Bart Schaefer [PATCH] FAQ update for aliasing 21Jan31,21:12 Bart Schaefer Re: print -C and terminators 21Feb01,16:13 Daniel Shahaf Re: [PATCH] FAQ update for aliasing 21Feb02,22:17 Joshua Krusell [PATCH] Improve error message from zparseopts -F 21Feb03,15:46 Joshua Krusell [PATCH] Add leading '-' to zparseopts option parsing errors 21Feb05,05:53 Bart Schaefer Re: NO_CASE_GLOB and unreadable directories (Episode VI: A New Hope) 21Feb05,23:01 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: completions for nsenter and unshare 21Feb05,23:18 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: complete BSD login classes and update for env 21Feb06,12:31 Daniel Shahaf Re: NO_CASE_GLOB and unreadable directories (Episode VI: A New Hope) 21Feb07,00:45 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: handle newer sort style in zstyle completion 21Feb07,01:08 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: update option completion for newer FreeBSD 21Feb07,01:33 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: update completions for openbsd 6.8 21Feb07,01:48 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: update completions for procps 3.3.16 21Feb07,23:03 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: update completions for DragonflyBSD 21Feb07,23:15 Oliver Kiddle PATCH: update completions for NetBSD 9 21Feb10,19:07 Bart Schaefer Re: Did something change about completion and xtrace ? That's all mails in the last 100 days that have a line starting with "--- " in the body of the message. I'm not sure if that decodes "Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64" before matching the regexp. Timestamps are UTC. I couldn't easily add X-Seq numbers to the output, sorry. Cheers, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-03-25 1:06 ` Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-03-28 1:48 ` Lawrence Velázquez 2021-03-29 6:30 ` Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) Daniel Shahaf 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-03-28 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Shahaf; +Cc: zsh-workers On Wed, Mar 24, 2021, at 9:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Lawrence Velázquez wrote on Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 19:45:59 -0400: > > My apologies, as patch manager I should have brought this to the > > list's attention, but I haven't worked back past mid-February yet. > > «~d '< 100d' ~b '^--- '» is my friend ☺ > > [...] > > That's all mails in the last 100 days that have a line starting with > "--- " in the body of the message. I'm not sure if that decodes > "Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64" before matching the regexp. > Timestamps are UTC. I couldn't easily add X-Seq numbers to the output, > sorry. Thanks! I worked back through December today and plan to do two or three months' worth of backlog every weekend (after more recent submissions, naturally). vq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) 2021-03-28 1:48 ` Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-03-29 6:30 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-03-29 6:35 ` Bart Schaefer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-03-29 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lawrence Velázquez; +Cc: zsh-workers Lawrence Velázquez wrote on Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 21:48:09 -0400: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021, at 9:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Lawrence Velázquez wrote on Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 19:45:59 -0400: > > > My apologies, as patch manager I should have brought this to the > > > list's attention, but I haven't worked back past mid-February yet. > > > > «~d '< 100d' ~b '^--- '» is my friend ☺ > > > > [...] > > > > That's all mails in the last 100 days that have a line starting with > > "--- " in the body of the message. I'm not sure if that decodes > > "Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64" before matching the regexp. > > Timestamps are UTC. I couldn't easily add X-Seq numbers to the output, > > sorry. > > Thanks! I worked back through December today and plan to do two or > three months' worth of backlog every weekend (after more recent > submissions, naturally). Thanks a lot! I didn't expect the new patch manager to go that far back through the archives, but it's certainly useful and appreciated! That does bring up the point of what to do with threads that peter out without a review. I suggest that they be added to Etc/BUGS. WDYT? Cheers, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) 2021-03-29 6:30 ` Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-03-29 6:35 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-03-29 7:26 ` Daniel Shahaf 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-03-29 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Shahaf; +Cc: Lawrence Velázquez, Zsh hackers list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 380 bytes --] On Sun, Mar 28, 2021, 11:30 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > That does bring up the point of what to do with threads that peter out > without a review. I suggest that they be added to Etc/BUGS. WDYT? > Only if they actually are threads about bug fixes. Proposed new features or completion improvements, just as examples, don't belong in the BUGS file. > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 891 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) 2021-03-29 6:35 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2021-03-29 7:26 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-05-16 17:07 ` Lawrence Velázquez 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-03-29 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zsh hackers list; +Cc: Lawrence Velázquez Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 23:35:58 -0700: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021, 11:30 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > > > > That does bring up the point of what to do with threads that peter out > > without a review. I suggest that they be added to Etc/BUGS. WDYT? > > > > Only if they actually are threads about bug fixes. Proposed new features > or completion improvements, just as examples, don't belong in the BUGS file. Are you objecting just to the name of the file, or to recording them at all? I.e., would recording them in an Etc/PROPOSED-NEW-FEATURES-AND-COMPLETION-IMPROVEMENTS file be better? Personally, I think I'd prefer a single file here, to remove a decision step from anyone updating or consuming these files, but I don't feel strongly about this. Cheers, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) 2021-03-29 7:26 ` Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-05-16 17:07 ` Lawrence Velázquez 2021-05-16 18:24 ` Bart Schaefer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-05-16 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers On Mon, Mar 29, 2021, at 3:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 23:35:58 -0700: > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021, 11:30 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > > > > > > > That does bring up the point of what to do with threads that peter out > > > without a review. I suggest that they be added to Etc/BUGS. WDYT? > > > > > > > Only if they actually are threads about bug fixes. Proposed new features > > or completion improvements, just as examples, don't belong in the BUGS file. > > Are you objecting just to the name of the file, or to recording them at > all? I.e., would recording them in an > Etc/PROPOSED-NEW-FEATURES-AND-COMPLETION-IMPROVEMENTS > file be better? Perhaps something like DISCUSSIONS? OPEN-DISCUSSIONS? SUBMISSIONS? PROPOSALS? (Reviving this because there are several discussions coming up on their third reminders, so I'm thinking about submitting a patch to list them in the repository somewhere.) -- vq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) 2021-05-16 17:07 ` Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-05-16 18:24 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-05-18 0:38 ` Daniel Shahaf 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Bart Schaefer @ 2021-05-16 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lawrence Velázquez; +Cc: Zsh hackers list On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 10:09 AM Lawrence Velázquez <larryv@zsh.org> wrote: > > (Reviving this because there are several discussions coming up on > their third reminders, so I'm thinking about submitting a patch to > list them in the repository somewhere.) How about Etc/UNRESOLVED ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) 2021-05-16 18:24 ` Bart Schaefer @ 2021-05-18 0:38 ` Daniel Shahaf 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Daniel Shahaf @ 2021-05-18 0:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zsh-workers Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, May 16, 2021 at 11:24:06 -0700: > On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 10:09 AM Lawrence Velázquez <larryv@zsh.org> wrote: > > > > (Reviving this because there are several discussions coming up on > > their third reminders, so I'm thinking about submitting a patch to > > list them in the repository somewhere.) > > How about Etc/UNRESOLVED ? I'd be fine with letting whoever creates the file choose its name. however, if we'd rather pick the bikeshed's colour collectively, then perhaps Etc/PATCHES or Etc/SUBMISSIONS. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers 2021-03-22 17:17 ` Stephane Chazelas 2021-03-22 23:45 ` Lawrence Velázquez @ 2021-03-23 5:34 ` dana 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: dana @ 2021-03-23 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephane Chazelas; +Cc: Zsh hackers list On 22 Mar 2021, at 12:17, Stephane Chazelas <stephane@chazelas.org> wrote: > Ping again. I've committed this. I also added a regression test and clarified the option's effect on [:IDENT:] in the documentation. Sorry i've been so inattentive dana ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-18 0:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-12-17 15:08 [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers Stephane Chazelas 2021-02-07 15:50 ` Stephane Chazelas 2021-02-07 20:24 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-02-08 5:53 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-02-08 20:51 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-02-09 9:11 ` Peter Stephenson 2021-03-22 17:17 ` Stephane Chazelas 2021-03-22 23:45 ` Lawrence Velázquez 2021-03-25 1:06 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-03-28 1:48 ` Lawrence Velázquez 2021-03-29 6:30 ` Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers) Daniel Shahaf 2021-03-29 6:35 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-03-29 7:26 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-05-16 17:07 ` Lawrence Velázquez 2021-05-16 18:24 ` Bart Schaefer 2021-05-18 0:38 ` Daniel Shahaf 2021-03-23 5:34 ` [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers dana
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).