* Re: [9fans] 3COM NIC
@ 2001-11-01 3:27 jmk
2001-11-01 4:20 ` [9fans] cpu/auth/fs Dharani Vilwanathan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: jmk @ 2001-11-01 3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
The 3C589 is a PCMCIA card, the 3C905B is a PCI card, they're
not really equivalent. The 3C905B will work OK with Plan 9, as
does the 3C589 Megahertz equivalent (sorry, I don't remember the
exact model number).
On Wed Oct 31 22:15:21 EST 2001, wstan@REMOVE.xs4all.nl wrote:
> Just a quick question. Would the
> 3Com 3C905B-TX PCI NIC card be a good choice
> for a Plan9 system? Anything better?
> The 3C589 doesn't seem to be offered
> anymore.
>
> Bill
> Amsterdam, NL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [9fans] cpu/auth/fs
2001-11-01 3:27 [9fans] 3COM NIC jmk
@ 2001-11-01 4:20 ` Dharani Vilwanathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dharani Vilwanathan @ 2001-11-01 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I am trying to build a Plan9 cpu/auth/file server (all in a single box). Is
it possible?
At the end of the document titled "Installing the Plan 9 Distribution", it
says:
"The kfs patches are currently being soaked and may appear before long."
Are the details available? Can someone tell me how I can do it?
Thanks
dharani
----- Original Message -----
From: <jmk@achille.cs.bell-labs.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] 3COM NIC
> The 3C589 is a PCMCIA card, the 3C905B is a PCI card, they're
> not really equivalent. The 3C905B will work OK with Plan 9, as
> does the 3C589 Megahertz equivalent (sorry, I don't remember the
> exact model number).
>
> On Wed Oct 31 22:15:21 EST 2001, wstan@REMOVE.xs4all.nl wrote:
> > Just a quick question. Would the
> > 3Com 3C905B-TX PCI NIC card be a good choice
> > for a Plan9 system? Anything better?
> > The 3C589 doesn't seem to be offered
> > anymore.
> >
> > Bill
> > Amsterdam, NL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] cpu/auth/fs
@ 2001-11-01 4:30 anothy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: anothy @ 2001-11-01 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
i believe the kfs patches to allow a cpu server to also act as a file server
(minus dumps, of course) are in the normal distribution now (i'm using
them, and i _think_ that's where i got them from). it's pretty easy (the fs
part is, anyway). set up the cpu server as normal, and just add the lines:
disk/kfscmd 'listen il!*!17008'
disk/kfscmd 'listen tcp!*!564'
to /rc/bin/cpurc, and it'll listen on the normal file server ports and serve
authenticated access to your kfs file system.
i _think_ that's what you're asking for. auth servers can be a bit
complicated to set up, but there isn't really anything _tricky_ about them,
and i think the documentation's sufficient. if you run into problems there,
let us (or me) know.
ア
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-01 4:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-01 3:27 [9fans] 3COM NIC jmk
2001-11-01 4:20 ` [9fans] cpu/auth/fs Dharani Vilwanathan
2001-11-01 4:30 anothy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).