From: "kim kubik" <chaotrope@jps.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] A prick into the wasps' nest ;-)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:10:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005301c44e76$fd1907c0$a1fafea9@KimKubik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40C57614.7030405@mipk.kharkiv.edu>
----- Original Message -----
From: cej@gli.cas.cz <cej@gli.cas.cz>
> > is OO paradigm overcome/superseeded/abandoned, or has more cons than
pros?
------
From: Vladimir Los <wlad@mipk.kharkiv.edu>
> may I answer it too?
> OO paradigm is not the question of programming (coding if you want).
> This is the thing of thinking and design.
-------
This interview might be of interest (she's a Sun "Java Evangelist"):
"... we seem to have reached the point where OO is no longer effective.
No one can comfortably negotiate a system with thousands of classes. So,
unfortunately, object-oriented programming has a fundamental flaw,
ironically related to its main strength."
- excerpted:
The Next Move in Programming: A Conversation with Sun's Victoria
Livschitz,
-- Senior IT Architect and Java Evangelist, Sun Microsystems
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Interviews/livschitz_qa.html
She also says:
"... An enormous mess of XML documents that are now being
created by enterprises at an alarming rate will be haunting our industry for
decades."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-09 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-08 6:51 cej
2004-06-08 8:17 ` Vladimir Los
2004-06-09 23:10 ` kim kubik [this message]
2004-06-09 23:22 ` boyd, rounin
2004-06-09 23:40 ` George Michaelson
2004-06-09 23:41 ` boyd, rounin
2004-06-09 23:41 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-06-09 23:44 ` boyd, rounin
2004-06-09 23:55 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-06-09 23:27 ` rog
2004-06-10 8:03 ` Vladimir Los
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-10 9:43 Andrew Simmons
2004-06-10 10:36 ` Nigel Roles
[not found] <20040609125113.UCQG24541.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@Xaplos>
[not found] ` <4fa4328626f76766f4799367fc0550c7@vitanuova.com>
2004-06-09 18:41 ` boyd, rounin
2004-06-10 8:16 ` vdharani
2004-06-10 3:25 ` boyd, rounin
2004-06-10 5:45 ` Nigel Roles
2004-06-10 9:20 ` Steve Simon
2004-06-10 9:20 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-06-10 14:55 ` boyd, rounin
[not found] <40C6C916.5080004@chunder.com>
2004-06-09 15:04 ` Mark F Rodriguez
2004-06-09 16:04 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-06-09 16:08 ` rog
2004-06-09 16:11 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-06-09 18:54 ` boyd, rounin
2004-06-07 7:09 cej
2004-06-07 15:53 ` Rob Pike
2004-06-08 7:32 ` Vladimir Los
2004-06-08 18:18 ` Sape Mullender
2004-06-08 18:55 ` Mark F Rodriguez
2004-06-08 18:58 ` William Josephson
2004-06-08 19:05 ` rog
2004-06-08 19:39 ` Mark F Rodriguez
2004-06-08 20:50 ` boyd, rounin
[not found] ` <40C6C6E8.1000302@chunder.com>
2004-06-20 22:35 ` vdharani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005301c44e76$fd1907c0$a1fafea9@KimKubik' \
--to=chaotrope@jps.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).