* [9fans] cc linux clusters
@ 2003-11-13 4:16 Scott Schwartz
2003-11-13 4:27 ` boyd, rounin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2003-11-13 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Anyone see Larry McVoy's slides on cache coherent clusters?
http://www.bitmover.com/cc-pitch/slide01.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] cc linux clusters
2003-11-13 4:16 [9fans] cc linux clusters Scott Schwartz
@ 2003-11-13 4:27 ` boyd, rounin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: boyd, rounin @ 2003-11-13 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Anyone see Larry McVoy's slides on cache coherent clusters?
>
> http://www.bitmover.com/cc-pitch/slide01.html
read it:
Multiple instances of the Linux OS on one system
the defense rests m'lud.
i reckon that ol' LM had better read up on locking too.
lister's OS book is a good read.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] cc linux clusters
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311130742460.32319-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
@ 2003-11-14 0:45 ` boyd, rounin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: boyd, rounin @ 2003-11-14 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> LM knows a thing or two about this, having spent years in both the sunos,
> and irix trenches.
i am not convinced; 'coarse' vs ''fine' grained locking is nonsense.
if you are gonna lock stuff a) think about it b) do it right.
but you knew that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-14 0:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-13 4:16 [9fans] cc linux clusters Scott Schwartz
2003-11-13 4:27 ` boyd, rounin
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311130742460.32319-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
2003-11-14 0:45 ` boyd, rounin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).