9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Sorace <anothy@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Current status of amd64 port?
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:18:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03FBEF09-261E-444D-8990-7536F727E21D@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9d474d0e3c3532030194ca7f071c0ab@coraid.com>

On Nov 15, 2007, at 18:39, erik quanstrom wrote:

> it's kind of silly to run 64-bit linux on a machine with <= 4GB of  
> memory.

unless, as you said, you need the registers (eh) or the direct vlong  
(nice for some things).

my new cpu server has 4GB today. i was shocked at how cheap it was.  
if the software can make use of it, upgrades beyond that are  
certainly not out of the question. it'd be nice to not have to worry  
about upas/fs eating all my ram. ;-)

also, i think there is benefit to early support for the "up and  
coming" platform. it's clearly the direction things are headed  
(although Windows has slowed that down some).

For those who've run it, do we have performance numbers for 8c vs 6c  
in various instances?
Anthony


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-16  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-15 22:51 Anthony Sorace
2007-11-15 22:56 ` Uriel
2007-11-16  6:14   ` ron minnich
2007-11-15 23:14 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2007-11-15 23:39   ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16  0:10     ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2007-11-16  0:18     ` Anthony Sorace [this message]
2007-11-16  7:57     ` Robert William Fuller
2007-11-16 10:05       ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 10:20         ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 22:38         ` ron minnich
2007-11-16 22:46           ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2007-11-16 23:20             ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 23:19           ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 23:40             ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 23:38               ` ron minnich
2007-11-16 23:56                 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 23:54                   ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-17  0:14                     ` ron minnich
2007-11-17  0:23                       ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-17  0:30                         ` ron minnich
2007-11-17  0:33                           ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-17  1:08                           ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-17  6:38                             ` Geoffrey Avila
2007-11-16 14:41     ` David Leimbach
2007-11-16 14:46       ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 15:33         ` Wilhelm B. Kloke
2007-11-16 15:33         ` David Leimbach
2007-11-16 15:35           ` David Leimbach
2007-11-16 15:53           ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 16:21             ` David Leimbach
2007-11-16  0:11 Joshua Wood
2007-11-16 14:43 ` David Leimbach
     [not found] <20071116170014.595B2108A1@mail.cse.psu.edu>
2007-11-16 23:10 ` Joshua Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03FBEF09-261E-444D-8990-7536F727E21D@gmail.com \
    --to=anothy@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).