From: Joshua Wood <josh@utopian.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Current status of amd64 port?
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:11:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8438B414-BE32-4A89-886B-23547C5B6D7F@utopian.net> (raw)
> 64 bits is neither here nor there in a vaccuum. you want 64 bits if
> a) you need more than 4GB of memory, or
> a) those extra registers and direct vlong really matter for
> performance.
> otherwise it's just a lot of extra zeros.
> it's kind of silly to run 64-bit linux on a machine with <= 4GB of
> memory.
>
Some testing we did about a year ago showed that (for us) even the
extra registers -- I always thought the sweetest-sounding part of the
deal -- help sometimes, but not always. I ended up thinking it was
because caches hadn't necessarily grown apace with address space. The
distance between cpu and main memory seemed to have expanded again...
64 bits was still the simplest path to > 4G memory for those linux
machines in that situation, but the observation surprised me.
--
Josh
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-16 0:11 Joshua Wood [this message]
2007-11-16 14:43 ` David Leimbach
[not found] <20071116170014.595B2108A1@mail.cse.psu.edu>
2007-11-16 23:10 ` Joshua Wood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-15 22:51 Anthony Sorace
2007-11-15 22:56 ` Uriel
2007-11-16 6:14 ` ron minnich
2007-11-15 23:14 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2007-11-15 23:39 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 0:10 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2007-11-16 0:18 ` Anthony Sorace
2007-11-16 7:57 ` Robert William Fuller
2007-11-16 10:05 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 10:20 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 22:38 ` ron minnich
2007-11-16 22:46 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2007-11-16 23:20 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 23:19 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 23:40 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 23:38 ` ron minnich
2007-11-16 23:56 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 23:54 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-17 0:14 ` ron minnich
2007-11-17 0:23 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-17 0:30 ` ron minnich
2007-11-17 0:33 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-17 1:08 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-17 6:38 ` Geoffrey Avila
2007-11-16 14:41 ` David Leimbach
2007-11-16 14:46 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-16 15:33 ` Wilhelm B. Kloke
2007-11-16 15:33 ` David Leimbach
2007-11-16 15:35 ` David Leimbach
2007-11-16 15:53 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-11-16 16:21 ` David Leimbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8438B414-BE32-4A89-886B-23547C5B6D7F@utopian.net \
--to=josh@utopian.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).