9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing
Date: Sat,  1 Mar 2008 09:13:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13426df10803010913w4325a6e9p54a5e4575b6d1754@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <775b8d190803010853k11ae59d0v6a6418ab30bccdb9@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also note that neither F77 nor ratfor produced particularly good code.
>  They did, however, work.  Both attributes are required by the Fortran
>  community.

ratfor was a preprocessor written in fortran, for fortran, which we
don't have, and gave us lots of
useful tools like, um, ed, and, uh, grep, uh, nroff and, uh, and ...
oh we have those already right?

I don't get the point of ratfor at all. It was originally to give
non-Unix people a taste of Unix.

Don't get me wrong, I used and loved those tools, but that was a generation ago.

But it's dead now, and the reasons for its existence don't apply to Plan 9.

We've got enough to do without any more Lazarus projects.

ron


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-01 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-01  4:55 lucio
2008-03-01  6:02 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-03-01  6:25   ` lucio
2008-03-01  6:39   ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01  6:52     ` lucio
2008-03-01  6:59       ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01  7:42         ` lucio
2008-03-01  7:56           ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01  7:11     ` ron minnich
2008-03-01  7:29       ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01 16:40         ` ron minnich
2008-03-01 16:50           ` Bruce Ellis
2008-03-01  8:14       ` lucio
2008-03-01 11:13         ` hiro
2008-03-01 11:47           ` [9fans] intellect? Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01 11:51             ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01 11:53             ` Charles Forsyth
2008-03-01 12:11             ` hiro
2008-03-01 12:37               ` hiro
2008-03-01 16:22     ` [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-03-01  7:12 ` ron minnich
2008-03-01  7:32   ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01 11:49 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-03-01 11:58   ` lucio
2008-03-01 18:15   ` don bailey
2008-03-01 18:24     ` erik quanstrom
2008-03-01 20:19     ` lucio
2008-03-01 21:36       ` ron minnich
2008-03-02  1:07         ` Paul Lalonde
2008-03-02  4:28           ` ron minnich
2008-03-02  8:03             ` Bruce Ellis
2008-03-02 11:12           ` Charles Forsyth
2008-03-02 16:21             ` Paul Lalonde
2008-03-02 18:59               ` erik quanstrom
2008-03-02 20:34                 ` Paul Lalonde
2008-03-02 22:00                   ` Philippe Anel
2008-03-03  3:19                     ` ron minnich
2008-03-03  9:12                       ` Philippe Anel
2008-03-03  3:25                     ` Paul Lalonde
2008-03-03  9:12                       ` Philippe Anel
2008-03-04  2:31                         ` Paul Lalonde
2008-03-03  3:31                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-03-04  0:49                     ` erik quanstrom
2008-03-04  2:17                       ` Paul Lalonde
2008-03-04  4:52                         ` erik quanstrom
2008-03-04 10:57                     ` Paweł Lasek
2008-03-04 14:57                       ` ron minnich
2008-03-04 15:55                         ` Philippe Anel
2008-03-04 18:27                           ` ron minnich
2008-03-04 18:00                       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-03-07  5:21   ` lucio
2008-03-07 10:21     ` Russ Cox
2008-03-07 11:15       ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-03-07 18:49         ` Skip Tavakkolian
2008-03-07 18:55           ` lucio
2008-03-07 17:22       ` lucio
2008-03-01 14:45 ` lejatorn
2008-03-01 14:49   ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-03-01 15:17     ` lucio
2008-03-01 16:35       ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-03-01 16:41       ` ron minnich
2008-03-01 16:53         ` Bruce Ellis
2008-03-01 17:13           ` ron minnich [this message]
2008-03-01 20:29             ` geoff
2008-03-01 21:36               ` ron minnich
2008-03-01 22:29                 ` Bruce Ellis
2008-03-04  7:35         ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-03-01 15:02   ` lucio
2008-03-01 16:31     ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-03-01 17:52     ` lejatorn
2008-03-02 17:57     ` sqweek
2008-03-02 18:22       ` lucio
2008-03-02 20:56       ` cinap_lenrek
2008-03-09 17:53 Aharon Robbins
2008-03-09 17:57 ` Bruce Ellis
2008-03-09 18:28 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-03-09 19:17   ` erik quanstrom
2008-03-09 19:22   ` Skip Tavakkolian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13426df10803010913w4325a6e9p54a5e4575b6d1754@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rminnich@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).