9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brian L. Stuart" <blstuart@bellsouth.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:51:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350568304.56828.YahooMailClassic@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> (raw)

>>        The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>>
>>      1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
>>      2) Lack of Object Oriented GUI configuration tools
>>      3) Lack of a decent web0browser
>>      4) Lack of a decent communication/messaging client
>>      5) Lack of an Office Applications suite
>>      ...
>>      ...
>>      ...
>>      z) Last, but not the least, hate towards C++ and love for the Go
>
>    But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)

Precisely.  The correlation between what makes something
good and what makes something popular is small but negative.
One of the primary reasons I stopped using Linux was that
it was becoming too mainstream and just like all the
commercial junk out there.

In general, I don't have any objection to reinventing the
wheel.  If no one ever did, we wouldn't have the pneumatic
tire.  But just fiddling about the edges and deciding what
color it should be is the worst of R&D sins.  It's BORING.

If you ever watch the TV shows that are competitions of
creative work, the most damning thing a judge can say is
that it's boring.  The same is true of software development
and engineering.  Besides, it it becomes unfun very quickly
if you can't start something new with a clean sheet of
paper at least every few months.

BLS




             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-18 13:51 Brian L. Stuart [this message]
2012-10-18 17:17 ` John Floren
2012-10-18 17:20   ` andrey mirtchovski
2012-10-18 18:32   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2012-10-18 21:07     ` Calvin Morrison
2012-10-19 15:31   ` Dan Cross
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-17 19:49 Aharon Robbins
2012-10-17 20:05 ` Christoph Lohmann
2012-10-17 20:19   ` Rodrigo Miranda
2012-10-18  0:29   ` erik quanstrom
2012-10-18  7:31     ` arnold
2012-10-18 13:54       ` erik quanstrom
2012-10-18  8:36   ` tlaronde
2012-10-18  9:03   ` Balwinder S Dheeman
2012-10-18 12:10     ` Oleksandr Iakovliev
2012-10-18 13:25       ` Nemo
2012-10-18 13:44     ` Stephen Wiley
2012-10-18 14:16   ` Pavel Klinkovsky
2012-10-18 16:50     ` Robert Raschke
2012-10-18 16:52       ` erik quanstrom
2012-10-18 17:47         ` Oleksandr Iakovliev
2012-10-17 20:22 ` Kurt H Maier
2012-10-18 14:18 ` yard-ape

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1350568304.56828.YahooMailClassic@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com \
    --to=blstuart@bellsouth.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).