* Re: [9fans] Performance
@ 2001-05-08 21:25 jmk
2001-05-08 21:30 ` Re[2]: " Matt H
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jmk @ 2001-05-08 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Tue May 8 14:46:27 EDT 2001, schwartz@bio.cse.psu.edu wrote:
> lmbench would be interesting to run once in a while. The overheads
> introduced by APE might be problematic, though.
it's just not worth the trouble. last time i looked it was so unix-centric
the results would be meaningless. how many line of code does it take to
determine the clock-rate of the cpu, doesn't the firmware print it out when
the machine boots?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re[2]: [9fans] Performance
2001-05-08 21:25 [9fans] Performance jmk
@ 2001-05-08 21:30 ` Matt H
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matt H @ 2001-05-08 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com
Hello jmk,
Tuesday, May 08, 2001, 10:25:18 PM, you wrote:
jpblc> On Tue May 8 14:46:27 EDT 2001, schwartz@bio.cse.psu.edu wrote:
>> lmbench would be interesting to run once in a while. The overheads
>> introduced by APE might be problematic, though.
jpblc> it's just not worth the trouble. last time i looked it was so unix-centric
jpblc> the results would be meaningless. how many line of code does it take to
jpblc> determine the clock-rate of the cpu, doesn't the firmware print it out when
jpblc> the machine boots?
they're not called Bogomips for nothing
--
Best regards,
Matt mailto:matt@proweb.co.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-08 21:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-08 21:25 [9fans] Performance jmk
2001-05-08 21:30 ` Re[2]: " Matt H
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).