* [9fans] netscape
@ 1998-04-08 4:49 Fariborz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fariborz @ 1998-04-08 4:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
Isn't porting Netscape to Plan9 one of the signs of Armageddon?
I seem to recall that C++ sources weren't included because Lucent
sells it as a separate product.
At 02:55 PM 4/7/98 +0200, you wrote:
>> I downloaded it, and thought it's too bad cfront source didn't
>> come with Plan9. I removed all the c++ tools from my system
>> because the source wasn't included...
>>
>> So first, do we want to port GNU C/C++???
>
>I thought this thread was a joke. I can't believe anyone really
>wants Netscape (candidate for worst program I've ever had
>to endure) for Plan 9. And lack of source isn't the only reason
>to remove all traces of C++ from your system!
>
>--
>http://users.ch.genedata.com/~enh/
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [9fans] netscape
@ 1998-04-07 12:55 Elliott.Hughes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Elliott.Hughes @ 1998-04-07 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
> I downloaded it, and thought it's too bad cfront source didn't
> come with Plan9. I removed all the c++ tools from my system
> because the source wasn't included...
>
> So first, do we want to port GNU C/C++???
I thought this thread was a joke. I can't believe anyone really
wants Netscape (candidate for worst program I've ever had
to endure) for Plan 9. And lack of source isn't the only reason
to remove all traces of C++ from your system!
--
http://users.ch.genedata.com/~enh/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [9fans] netscape
@ 1998-04-07 12:44 G.David
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: G.David @ 1998-04-07 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
I downloaded it, and thought it's too bad cfront source didn't
come with Plan9. I removed all the c++ tools from my system
because the source wasn't included...
So first, do we want to port GNU C/C++???
David Butler
gdb@dbSystems.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [9fans] netscape
@ 1998-04-07 7:50 Nigel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nigel @ 1998-04-07 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
Ah, but all these browsers are operating systems in their own right.
Shouldn't we be
porting Plan 9 to Netscape?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: schwartz+9fans@cse.psu.edu [SMTP:schwartz+9fans@cse.psu.edu]
> Sent: 07 April 1998 08:28
> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
> Subject: [9fans] netscape
>
> So, anyone thinking of porting netscape to Plan 9? It does, after
> all,
> have one big advantage over mothra: support for unicode!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [9fans] netscape
@ 1998-04-07 7:27 Scott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Scott @ 1998-04-07 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
So, anyone thinking of porting netscape to Plan 9? It does, after all,
have one big advantage over mothra: support for unicode!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-04-08 4:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-04-08 4:49 [9fans] netscape Fariborz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-04-07 12:55 Elliott.Hughes
1998-04-07 12:44 G.David
1998-04-07 7:50 Nigel
1998-04-07 7:27 Scott
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).