* [9fans] longer file names
@ 1998-04-10 19:46 Scott
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Scott @ 1998-04-10 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
"Tom Duff" <td@pixar.com> writes:
| It's ludicrous to make an incompatible change like this with, as you noted,
| such far-reaching consequences, just for one weird little application.
| If your application doesn't like the names the file system gives it,
| keep a little name-mapping table somewhere and write open and create
| routines that use it.
Regardless of the merits of Dave's application, there are other times
when short names are an issue. Look at ftpfs: It uses a clever hack
to work around the name length problem, but why should it have to? In
a system where directories play such a useful and generalized role, it
makes sense (to me anyway) to let them contain long names.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1998-04-10 19:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-04-10 19:46 [9fans] longer file names Scott
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).