Re: [9fans] FS question

Re: [9fans] FS question

[bruce]

If a file could be removed but still remain accessible
(via an open file descriptor) then that might suggest an implementation
where the file was distinct from its name.  Once that separation
existed then it might have been thought interesting to allow
multiple names for the same file.

What did Multics do?
ken?

Re: [9fans] FS question

[Bruce Ellis]

that's not me.  just in case you guys thought i'd gone into IT.

brucee
----- Original Message -----
From: <bruce@it.usyd.edu.au>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] FS question


> If a file could be removed but still remain accessible
> (via an open file descriptor) then that might suggest an implementation
> where the file was distinct from its name.  Once that separation
> existed then it might have been thought interesting to allow
> multiple names for the same file.
>
> What did Multics do?
> ken?

Re: [9fans] FS question

[Lucio De Re]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:26:24PM +1100, Bruce Ellis wrote:
>
> that's not me.  just in case you guys thought i'd gone into IT.
>
> brucee

No, we know you Australians are all named either Bruce or Sheila ;-)

++L

Re: [9fans] FS question

[Boyd Roberts]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 373 bytes --]

"Lucio De Re" <lucio@proxima.alt.za> a �crit dans le message de
news:20031111142831.C6815@cackle.proxima.alt.za...
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:26:24PM +1100, Bruce Ellis wrote:
> >
> > that's not me.  just in case you guys thought i'd gone into IT.
> >
> > brucee
>
> No, we know you Australians are all named either Bruce or Sheila ;-)
>
> ++L

or, boyd

Re: [9fans] FS question

[Andrew Simmons]

>
>or, boyd
Welcome back. Do you mind if we call you "Bruce" to avoid any confusion?

Re: [9fans] FS question

[Brantley Coile]

Boyd,

Is it just me, or have you been gone the same period
that Rush Limbaugh has been in rehab?

 Brantley

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:55:43 +1300, Andrew Simmons <andrew.simmons@monitorbm.co.nz> wrote:

>
>>
>> or, boyd
> Welcome back. Do you mind if we call you "Bruce" to avoid any confusion?
>
>

Re: [9fans] FS question

[boyd, rounin]

> Boyd,
>
> Is it just me, or have you been gone the same period
> that Rush Limbaugh has been in rehab?

ask rush.  i don't remember a thing.

Re: [9fans] FS question

[boyd, rounin]

> Welcome back. Do you mind if we call you "Bruce" to avoid any confusion?

You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.

    -- Bullet Tooth Tony

[9fans] Bruce

[Michael Baldwin]

> Do you mind if we call you "Bruce" to avoid any confusion?

That would be me, Michael Baldwin, even though I'm not from Pommyland.

Re: [9fans] FS question

[Skip Tavakkolian]

> You can call me Susan if it makes you happy.

Welcome back Susan.

Re: [9fans] FS question

[Dan Cross]

"Skip Tavakkolian" <fst@centurytel.net> writes:
> Welcome back Susan.

``Surely you're not serious!''
``I am serious.  And don't call me Shirley.''

	- Dan C.

Re: [9fans] Bruce

[Bruce Ellis]

sounds like a good day to visit woolloomooloo, tho there still isn't
a university there.

brucee
----- Original Message -----
From: <a@9srv.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] Bruce


> okay, so Michael Baldwin (the one who post here once in a
> while) == Bruce, boyd == Susan, and i suppose ("to avoid
> confusion") Bruce Ellis == brucee.
>
> this is gonna be fun. :-)