* Re: [9fans] 10141111.9gz patches..
@ 2000-11-15 18:44 Russ Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2000-11-15 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
It is safe to use
wrap/inst -F 10141111.9z
This may be a false alarm (regarding /386/bin/acme).
Others have had similar troubles. But you should be
able to edit the wrap/inst -F command that wrap/inst prints
and then send it.
Russ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [9fans] 10141111.9gz patches..
@ 2000-11-15 14:25 Ish Rattan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ish Rattan @ 2000-11-15 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I tried to apply the patches as
wrap/inst 10141111.9gz
it says that files are newer and skips, the files have not
been modified but the system was installed on 10/14/00 after
a crash..
skillping /386/bin/acme: newer than archive
...
ls -l /386/bin/acme
-rwxrwxrwx ... Oct 14 16:45 /386/bin/acme
It is safe to use
wrap/inst -F 10141111.9z
I do not want to reinstall?
- ishwar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-11-15 18:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-11-15 18:44 [9fans] 10141111.9gz patches Russ Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-15 14:25 Ish Rattan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).