Re: [9fans] plan9 iPAQ

Re: [9fans] plan9 iPAQ

[presotto]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 330 bytes --]

The H3650 (or 3630).  We just got a new one that hangs after a while
so we have to figure out what changed.  I should put the port out
there.  I wanted to get the file system working first but got side
tracked so brucee (bruce ellis) is doing it.  Give me another few
weeks and if I haven't put the port out there, complain.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1695 bytes --]

From: Sam Ducksworth <sam@ducksworth.com>
To: 9fans mailing list <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: [9fans] plan9 iPAQ
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 17:09:37 -0800
Message-ID: <3A7DFD51.199412CA@ducksworth.com>

hello,

a few weeks ago someone mentioned about
a port of plan9 for the iPAQ. i was just
wondering which model you guys were using.
was it the iPAQ H3600 or the older H3100?

[9fans] What's up with plan9.bell-labs.com?

[Jim Choate]

The site has been non-responsive for several hours now...?

Am I trapped in a Plan 9-less alternate universe?

    ____________________________________________________________________

           Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a
           smaller group must first understand it.

                                           "Stranger Suns"
                                           George Zebrowski

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [9fans] What's up with plan9.bell-labs.com?

[Dan Cross]

In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010205233515.356x-100000@einstein.ssz.com> you write:
>The site has been non-responsive for several hours now...?
>
>Am I trapped in a Plan 9-less alternate universe?

I don't know, but the packets I've been sending there don't seem to
get outside of New York City.  Perhaps they're scared of Jersey, but
it's more likely just a confused router somewhere.

	- Dan C.

Re: [9fans] What's up with plan9.bell-labs.com?

[Jim Kelleman]

murray hill was without power during the night
due to the weather...

Dan Cross wrote:
>
> In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010205233515.356x-100000@einstein.ssz.com> you write:
> >The site has been non-responsive for several hours now...?
> >
> >Am I trapped in a Plan 9-less alternate universe?
>
> I don't know, but the packets I've been sending there don't seem to
> get outside of New York City.  Perhaps they're scared of Jersey, but
> it's more likely just a confused router somewhere.
>
>         - Dan C.

Re: [9fans] plan9 iPAQ

[nw]

If you're looking for encouragement or critical mass, I am interested
in testing the IPaq PocketPC port as well.

Will it function with the builtin memory only (32Mb) or require
additional storage?

Re: [9fans] plan9 iPAQ

[please_no_spam_to_]

: If you're looking for encouragement or critical mass, I am interested
: in testing the IPaq PocketPC port as well.

Ditto.

: Will it function with the builtin memory only (32Mb) or require
: additional storage?

Like those very nice IBM 1GB CF discs?

--
	David Pick

Re: [9fans] plan9 iPAQ

[nw]

On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:37:20 GMT, presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
>Give me another few
>weeks and if I haven't put the port out there, complain.

Not a complaint, but an ever so slight nudge. Content to wait. Curious
about the implementation choices, wrt 3-button mice versus
touch-screen.

Re: [9fans] plan9 iPAQ

[Sam Ducksworth]

if you are thinking of getting one you may want to
hold off a month or 2. rumor has it they are going 
to bump the memory up from 32M to 64M. 

but its like anything else, as soon as you get 'X'
they come out with 'Y'

nw@metadesign.com.au wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:37:20 GMT, presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> >Give me another few
> >weeks and if I haven't put the port out there, complain.
> 
> Not a complaint, but an ever so slight nudge. Content to wait. Curious
> about the implementation choices, wrt 3-button mice versus
> touch-screen.

-- 

-sam