* [9fans] mk
@ 2001-04-12 4:53 Taj Khattra
2001-04-23 8:41 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Taj Khattra @ 2001-04-12 4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
on 14 jul 2000, forsyth wrote:
> >>What I'd like to see... mk for Unix :) Anyone here who has attempted to port
> >>it over (along with rc of course)?
>
> i should be making a portable version of mk available shortly from a Vita Nuova site.
> it's the version used to build Inferno on Unix and Windows.
has this portable version of mk been released yet ?
thanks
-taj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-12 4:53 [9fans] mk Taj Khattra
@ 2001-04-23 8:41 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-04-23 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
"Taj Khattra" <taj.khattra@pobox.com> a crit dans le message news:
20010412045343.634.qmail@infidel.intergate.ca...
> on 14 jul 2000, forsyth wrote:
> > >>What I'd like to see... mk for Unix :) Anyone here who has attempted
to port
> > >>it over (along with rc of course)?
> >
> > i should be making a portable version of mk available shortly from a
Vita Nuova site.
> > it's the version used to build Inferno on Unix and Windows.
brave man karl. i was gonna port it to inferno, but was told
NOT to attempt it 'cos it's a real mess and doesn't address the
problem correctly.
bonus points: guess my source
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-27 0:08 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-27 14:41 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
@ 2001-04-27 16:55 ` Sam Ducksworth
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ducksworth @ 2001-04-27 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
damn i thought it was scotty from star trek
came up with that rule.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Boyd Roberts wrote:
> > Plus allow plenty of room for the next upgrade.
>
> john mackin used to have this theory called:
>
> estimating by three's
>
> you think it'll take 1 hour, so say 3 hours.
>
> " 1 day = 3 days
> " 1 month = 3 months
>
> etc
>
>
>
--sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-27 0:08 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-04-27 14:41 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-04-27 16:55 ` Sam Ducksworth
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Douglas A. Gwyn @ 2001-04-27 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Boyd Roberts wrote:
> john mackin used to have this theory called:
> estimating by three's
> you think it'll take 1 hour, so say 3 hours.
My boss when I worked in a small interactive graphics software
house had made a similar observation. However, it doesn't work
right unless you make an honest stab at estimating how long you
really think the job should take. *Then* the supervisor should
multiply by three.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-26 16:40 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
@ 2001-04-27 0:08 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-27 14:41 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-04-27 16:55 ` Sam Ducksworth
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-04-27 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Plus allow plenty of room for the next upgrade.
john mackin used to have this theory called:
estimating by three's
you think it'll take 1 hour, so say 3 hours.
" 1 day = 3 days
" 1 month = 3 months
etc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-24 14:28 ` Re[2]: " matt
@ 2001-04-26 16:40 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-04-27 0:08 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Douglas A. Gwyn @ 2001-04-26 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
matt wrote:
> thei sys req. are just like time estimates. Work 'em out, double it
> and then add a bit more!
Plus allow plenty of room for the next upgrade.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-24 9:57 forsyth
2001-04-24 11:08 ` Nikolai Saoukh
@ 2001-04-24 12:31 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-04-24 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: <forsyth@vitanuova.com>
> yes, at least for Inferno we know it's fine on the 2000 Professional clients
> (at least those we tried -- you can't take anything for granted) ...
it is, modulo that it's relying on that house of cards known as '2000.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-24 9:01 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
@ 2001-04-24 12:28 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-24 14:28 ` Re[2]: " matt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-04-24 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <gwyn@arl.army.mil>
>
> Both sam and Inferno work just fine on Windows 2000 Professional.
>
yeah, i understand why i have problems. it's the '2000 memory
[mis]management that kicks in and randomly breaks stuff.
you'd think 64Mb would be enough, but no. if it take 2+ months
to get a 3com PCMCIA dongle there's no way i'm even going to
go and bother to look for memory -- not in this country.
nor am i gonna let anyone take a vaio apart to upgrade. to fix
a liquid spill that took out several keys sony vaio service _broke_
the motherboard. when i shipped it, everything worked except
a few keys. they told me some bullshit story about how the
liquid had the same properties of hydroflouric acid and that
had killed the motherboard -- nonsense.
64Mb? that nearly as big as an RM-03 pack.
last time i asked:
is this [CAT-5] cable crossed or not
some kid started to give me the 3rd degree about what i wanted
to do etc ... so i told him to answer the question:
oui ou non
nope too hard. better off to have an argument. i think that's
why my french is so good. years of arguing.
like riggs [_lethal weapon_] says [approx quote]:
thing get get complex all by themselves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-24 9:57 forsyth
@ 2001-04-24 11:08 ` Nikolai Saoukh
2001-04-24 12:31 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Nikolai Saoukh @ 2001-04-24 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> yes, at least for Inferno we know it's fine on the 2000 Professional clients
> (at least those we tried -- you can't take anything for granted) but i think
> there might be a problem with 2000 Server [SP1], or so we've been told.
inferno works just fine on win200 professional, but
fails on Windows XP (a.k.a. Whistler) Professional Beta 2 --
GUI shows just noise in window.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
@ 2001-04-24 9:57 forsyth
2001-04-24 11:08 ` Nikolai Saoukh
2001-04-24 12:31 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-04-24 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 231 bytes --]
yes, at least for Inferno we know it's fine on the 2000 Professional clients
(at least those we tried -- you can't take anything for granted) but i think
there might be a problem with 2000 Server [SP1], or so we've been told.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1698 bytes --]
To: cse.psu.edu!9fans
Subject: Re: [9fans] mk
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:01:30 GMT
Message-ID: <3AE4AC90.F9510C8B@arl.army.mil>
Boyd Roberts wrote:
> btw: sam doesn't work on '2000.
Both sam and Inferno work just fine on Windows 2000 Professional.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-23 8:45 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-04-24 9:01 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-04-24 12:28 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Douglas A. Gwyn @ 2001-04-24 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Boyd Roberts wrote:
> btw: sam doesn't work on '2000.
Both sam and Inferno work just fine on Windows 2000 Professional.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-23 15:43 rsc
@ 2001-04-23 19:28 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-04-23 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
> while(){
> fortune /lib/words
> }
it'd be cheaper to get a bunch of linux hacks to type/hack away.
they might not produce anything useful, but it would be huge.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
@ 2001-04-23 15:43 rsc
2001-04-23 19:28 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: rsc @ 2001-04-23 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
boyd wrote:
> bonus points: guess my source
while(){
fortune /lib/words
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
2001-04-12 14:51 forsyth
@ 2001-04-23 8:45 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-24 9:01 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-04-23 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
<forsyth@vitanuova.com> a crit dans le message news:
20010412145053.0DFFF199F6@mail.cse.psu.edu...
> i did everything except actually release it, but that should
> happen shortly, once i go round the loop of target systems
> once more.
i'd love a version for window's 2000. i want to write
limbo and have a web browser and the whole deal. plan 9
can't do that for me. but inferno on '2000 would do
exactly what i need.
re: charon -- i won't use it. i've tried and read the code.
i really think [on plan 9] that:
mk CONF='foobar' foobar
is just stupid or how ever it goes.
in the old days:
make foobar
would do it even though the concept of 'mk' (9th Ed?) is
much better. why type stuff twice? it maybe fine if you
have a qwerty keyboard, but not all of us do, nor want one.
btw: sam doesn't work on '2000. i suspect it's the 'memory
[mis]management' on '2000.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] mk
@ 2001-04-12 14:51 forsyth
2001-04-23 8:45 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-04-12 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]
i did everything except actually release it, but that should
happen shortly, once i go round the loop of target systems
once more.
i can tell anyone who needs it where to find a preliminary version.
it's not just mk but includes some other things as well.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1970 bytes --]
To: cse.psu.edu!9fans
Subject: [9fans] mk
Date: 12 Apr 2001 04:53:43 -0000
Message-ID: <20010412045343.634.qmail@infidel.intergate.ca>
on 14 jul 2000, forsyth wrote:
> >>What I'd like to see... mk for Unix :) Anyone here who has attempted to port
> >>it over (along with rc of course)?
>
> i should be making a portable version of mk available shortly from a Vita Nuova site.
> it's the version used to build Inferno on Unix and Windows.
has this portable version of mk been released yet ?
thanks
-taj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-27 16:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-12 4:53 [9fans] mk Taj Khattra
2001-04-23 8:41 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-12 14:51 forsyth
2001-04-23 8:45 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-24 9:01 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-04-24 12:28 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-24 14:28 ` Re[2]: " matt
2001-04-26 16:40 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-04-27 0:08 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-27 14:41 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-04-27 16:55 ` Sam Ducksworth
2001-04-23 15:43 rsc
2001-04-23 19:28 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-24 9:57 forsyth
2001-04-24 11:08 ` Nikolai Saoukh
2001-04-24 12:31 ` Boyd Roberts
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).