From: anothy@cosym.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan 9 annoyances
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 00:21:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011015042244.8C8CE19A19@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)
// i see no real reason for "mk nuke" to exist.
i find there to be a useful distinction between these two:
"blow away all the intermediate files generated from a mk here"
"blow away _everything_ generated from a mk here"
i generally don't want 'mk clean' to blow away 8.out (although it does
in some places), but it's useful to have a command to get back to a
"pristine" state.
having 'mk nuke' blow away an installed libap.a does seem wrong,
although the building of libraries is sort of odd. i'd still be inclined to
change that.
ア (i recently got ktrans working - thanks kenji - and am very
excited about it!)
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-15 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-15 4:21 anothy [this message]
2001-10-15 4:59 okamoto
2001-10-15 5:28 okamoto
2001-10-15 5:44 okamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011015042244.8C8CE19A19@mail.cse.psu.edu \
--to=anothy@cosym.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).