From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:46:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011016194332.0DEA719A0C@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 445 bytes --]
even on plan 9,
mk clean clears out the object files that are now installed in the libraries,
but leaves the libraries. (some other targets are sometimes left behind, not just libraries.)
mk nuke removes the target libraries (and sometimes other targets) as well.
the distinction is helpful when working with the compilers, and perhaps upas.
mk pristine might be a better name, since nukes leave quite a mess, but
it's harder to type.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1644 bytes --]
From: David Gordon Hogan <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 14:36:55 -0400
Message-ID: <20011015183659.58FA419A3C@mail.cse.psu.edu>
> So, please explain "different purposes" served by "mk clean" and "mk nuke".
It is perhaps worth noting that under Inferno, "mk nuke" is much more
aggressive, actually removing installed libraries and dis files.
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-16 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-16 19:46 forsyth [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-15 18:36 David Gordon Hogan
2001-10-15 14:45 presotto
2001-10-11 15:17 forsyth
2001-10-11 19:29 ` Micah Stetson
2001-10-11 12:21 bwc
2001-10-11 11:20 forsyth
2001-10-12 9:23 ` pac
2001-10-10 10:50 forsyth
2001-10-10 13:06 ` Sam Hopkins
2001-10-10 10:45 forsyth
2001-10-09 17:08 forsyth
2001-10-10 8:56 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-10 9:55 ` Mike Haertel
2001-10-10 10:09 ` Lucio De Re
2001-10-11 9:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-09 16:55 anothy
2001-10-09 15:23 anothy
2001-10-09 14:56 anothy
2001-10-09 13:18 bwc
2001-10-10 8:57 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-09 10:55 rog
2001-10-09 11:50 ` George Michaelson
2001-10-09 10:12 forsyth
2001-10-09 16:18 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-08 21:24 Russ Cox
2001-10-08 21:21 rog
2001-10-08 20:17 Russ Cox
2001-10-14 19:54 ` Mike Haertel
2001-10-15 6:46 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-15 8:30 ` Mike Haertel
2001-10-08 16:51 anothy
2001-10-09 9:04 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-09 9:04 ` Ralph Corderoy
2001-10-10 8:56 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-08 6:27 [9fans] mv vs cp Lucio De Re
2001-10-08 8:38 ` Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp) Mike Haertel
2001-10-08 9:08 ` Lucio De Re
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011016194332.0DEA719A0C@mail.cse.psu.edu \
--to=forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).