From: Borja Marcos <borjamar@sarenet.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 13:57:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110291257.f9TCvUp32392@borja.sarenet.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011029123819.DCCD7199E4@mail.cse.psu.edu>
On Monday 29 October 2001 13:38, you wrote:
> I'm a radical here, but I think if a machine is paging, you've lost.
> To me, VM is a pretty technique for memory management in the kernel,
> something distinct from paging, which is a way to get the system
> through temprorary overshoots in memory demand.
That's right. Virtual memory avoids, for example, the memory fragmentation
problem. Memory is divided into fixed-size pages, and the address space of a
process doesn't need to be contiguous. Processes see a "logical" address
space which is translated to physical addresses by the MMU.
So, virtual memory is in my opinion a very good thing.
Regarding paging, it depends on *how* much does it page. I don't mind if my
machine has to page sometimes. There are rules of thumb that specify a degree
of "acceptable badness". ;-)
Borja.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-29 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-29 12:38 rob pike
2001-10-29 12:57 ` Borja Marcos [this message]
2001-10-30 15:22 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-30 15:22 ` John S. Dyson
2001-10-30 21:13 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-11-02 9:59 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-30 15:23 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-10-31 10:00 ` John S. Dyson
2001-10-31 18:12 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-31 20:21 ` Dan Cross
2001-11-13 10:34 ` John S. Dyson
2001-11-02 9:58 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-13 11:56 forsyth
[not found] <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>
2001-11-01 21:19 ` David Gordon Hogan
2001-11-01 21:23 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-10-30 16:08 bwc
2001-10-30 15:37 bwc
2001-10-25 17:55 Russ Cox
2001-10-25 18:29 ` William Josephson
2001-10-29 10:16 ` John S. Dyson
2001-10-25 16:59 Wladimir Mutel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200110291257.f9TCvUp32392@borja.sarenet.es \
--to=borjamar@sarenet.es \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).