9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: forsyth@vitanuova.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] pascal, TeX
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:40:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011214173328.E0F9D199BB@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]

i've found that troff -mpm produces rather nice output,
even compared to TeX.
unfortunately it's not in the current distribution (partly
because the pm postprocessor is in C++)


[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2412 bytes --]

To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] pascal, TeX
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:04:29 GMT
Message-ID: <3C1A278D.6F117C50@null.net>

paurea@dei.inf.uc3m.es wrote:
> I am wondering... you who criticize *TeX actually write real math
> books (lots of formulas, commutative diagrams, integrals with strange
> stuff...)  with troff and eqn?... I have found that there is where
> they beat any of the other things I have tried (never tried troff though).

I've used both.  Generally, TeX produces somewhat nicer-looking
output, but I find eqn|tbl|troff easier to use.  The DWB (troff)
suite is certainly more "toolkit oriented" and has a variety of
nice "small language" preprocessors for specialized tasks such
as drawing graphs, plotting, chemical symbols, etc.  Either
system is vastly better than something like Microsoft Word.

             reply	other threads:[~2001-12-14 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-14 17:40 forsyth [this message]
2001-12-17 10:15 ` Ralph Corderoy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-18  0:37 okamoto
2001-12-17  8:29 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-12-14 18:03 rob pike
2001-12-14 17:43 ` Lucio De Re
2001-12-14 18:09 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-12-14 18:22 ` Andrey A Mirtchovski
2001-12-16 19:41 ` Andrew Simmons
2001-12-17 10:16   ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-12-17 10:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-12-17 10:16 ` Wladimir Mutel
2001-12-14 17:59 bwc
2001-12-14  1:42 geoff
2001-12-13 19:02 forsyth
2001-12-14 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-12-14 17:37 ` D De Villiers
2001-12-17 10:14   ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-12-13 17:38 erik quanstrom
2001-12-13 17:51 ` Howard Trickey
2001-12-14 10:15   ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-12-13 17:56 ` George Michaelson
2001-12-13 18:02   ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-13 18:09     ` George Michaelson
2001-12-13 18:11   ` Boyd Roberts
2001-12-13 18:18     ` George Michaelson
2001-12-13 18:21     ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-14  7:19       ` paurea
2001-12-14  8:07         ` Steve Kilbane
2001-12-14 17:04         ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-12-13 18:55     ` Martin Harriss
2001-12-13 21:20       ` Steve Kilbane
2001-12-14 10:15     ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-12-18  9:47     ` Chet Ramey
2001-12-14  0:39   ` Dan Cross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011214173328.E0F9D199BB@mail.cse.psu.edu \
    --to=forsyth@vitanuova.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).