From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] pascal, TeX
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:04:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C1A278D.6F117C50@null.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15385.42998.56458.344335@nanonic.hilbert.space>
paurea@dei.inf.uc3m.es wrote:
> I am wondering... you who criticize *TeX actually write real math
> books (lots of formulas, commutative diagrams, integrals with strange
> stuff...) with troff and eqn?... I have found that there is where
> they beat any of the other things I have tried (never tried troff though).
I've used both. Generally, TeX produces somewhat nicer-looking
output, but I find eqn|tbl|troff easier to use. The DWB (troff)
suite is certainly more "toolkit oriented" and has a variety of
nice "small language" preprocessors for specialized tasks such
as drawing graphs, plotting, chemical symbols, etc. Either
system is vastly better than something like Microsoft Word.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-14 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-13 17:38 erik quanstrom
2001-12-13 17:51 ` Howard Trickey
2001-12-14 10:15 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-12-13 17:56 ` George Michaelson
2001-12-13 18:02 ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-13 18:09 ` George Michaelson
2001-12-13 18:11 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-12-13 18:18 ` George Michaelson
2001-12-13 18:21 ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-14 7:19 ` paurea
2001-12-14 8:07 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-12-14 17:04 ` Douglas A. Gwyn [this message]
2001-12-13 18:55 ` Martin Harriss
2001-12-13 21:20 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-12-14 10:15 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-12-18 9:47 ` Chet Ramey
2001-12-14 0:39 ` Dan Cross
2001-12-13 19:02 forsyth
2001-12-14 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-12-14 17:37 ` D De Villiers
2001-12-17 10:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-12-14 1:42 geoff
2001-12-14 17:40 forsyth
2001-12-17 10:15 ` Ralph Corderoy
2001-12-14 17:59 bwc
2001-12-14 18:03 rob pike
2001-12-14 17:43 ` Lucio De Re
2001-12-14 18:09 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-12-14 18:22 ` Andrey A Mirtchovski
2001-12-16 19:41 ` Andrew Simmons
2001-12-17 10:16 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-12-17 10:14 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-12-17 10:16 ` Wladimir Mutel
2001-12-17 8:29 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2001-12-18 0:37 okamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C1A278D.6F117C50@null.net \
--to=dagwyn@null.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).