9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt H <matt@proweb.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] compilers - was GUI toolkit for Plan 9
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:34:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020226213451.56e87b33.matt@proweb.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <181b9e858518e43368953c1050365780@plan9.bell-labs.com>

Okay, I'm no compiler writer or even very proficient C coder but all this
talk of turning optimizations off concerns me. Not because of the threat
of "badly" generated code but because the chip makers (well Intel is the
only one I really read about) are pushing the responsibility for
optimization out of the silicon and into the compiler. (providing I
understand what I read!)

In my minimal contact with C I've regarded optimizations with scorn,
because like disk compression schemes a lá DoubleSpace, my first
encounters were tainted by failure. All optimizations did then (MS C ver 3
on win3.1 i think) was crash quickly.

Does anybody know how runtime optimizations such as those in the Crusoe
chip fair at this? If optimization is tricky at compile time sounds like
doing it at runtime must be hairy. Has anyone even tried to run plan9 on a
Crusoe?

M



  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26 20:28 [9fans] " presotto
2002-02-26 21:34 ` Matt H [this message]
2002-02-26 22:06   ` [9fans] compilers - was " Theo Honohan
2002-02-27  0:21   ` Mike Haertel
2002-02-28 15:11     ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-28 16:55       ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27  6:54 ` [9fans] " Eric Dorman
2002-02-27 10:20   ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 10:51     ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 13:27       ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-27 14:20       ` Ish Rattan
2002-02-27 22:44       ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28  4:41         ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-28 10:19           ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 10:14       ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 10:49         ` Matt H
2002-03-01 13:25           ` chad
2002-02-28  3:26     ` [9fans] GUI toolkit for Plan 9 [really GPL again!] Eric Dorman
2002-02-28  9:57     ` [9fans] GUI toolkit for Plan 9 ozan s yigit
2002-02-28 14:55 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-26 22:17 [9fans] compilers - was " jmk
2002-02-27  2:38 Russ Cox
2002-02-27  9:28 Bengt Kleberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020226213451.56e87b33.matt@proweb.co.uk \
    --to=matt@proweb.co.uk \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).