From: Jonathan Cast <jcast@ou.edu>
To: weigelt@metux.de,
Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Announce: standalone libixp
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:31:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707031531.31042.jcast@ou.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070703151059.GA20385@nibiru.local>
On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
<snip>
> The major problem is the inherent conflict
> between marked-based economoy (which IMHO grants the most personal
> freedom) and the concept of social wellfare. Both concepts cannot
> be merged within one system, since they conflict each other.
> But IMHO both concepts are necessary.
>
> So my idea is to do both things separately. The component of social
> wellfare is to give everyone enough money so he can afford evthing
> that's needed for life, including a home, food, clothes, communication,
> education, healtcare, etc. It's not very hard to calculate an value
> for some (well-defined) group of people within some region on the
> current marked prices. Simply give the people that value as an
> unconditional income, just because they're living Human. The really
> most of all "social systems" are immediately unnecessar at that point.
> The risk of poverty is immediately eliminated (of course people who
> are too sick to care for themselves are an very special and rare case,
> they'll need further assistance nevertheless). Additionally we need
> a few marked regulations for transparencey and reliability of some
> fundamental economic good, ie. insurance contracts w/o pitfalls, etc.
>
> Once we have ensured the constraint that evryone can afford all things
> important for living, we can give almost evrything to the marked.
> (leaves only a few implementation details to discuss). Most aspects
> of what's currently called basic social care (ie. playschool) can
> be done by private institutions. Non-profit ones could play a big
> role here.
And I thought /I/ was the only one. Have we really gotten to the point in
political science where sane ideas can be uttered safely in public?
<snip>
Jonathan Cast
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-core
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-emacs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-03 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-30 15:38 Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-30 16:47 ` Kris Maglione
2007-06-30 16:50 ` Kris Maglione
2007-06-30 17:30 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-30 17:41 ` Kris Maglione
2007-07-01 12:50 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-07-01 16:15 ` Iruata Souza
2007-07-01 10:11 ` Charles Forsyth
[not found] ` <dba1bd02516b1cfbf4119d7c567ec8e9@terzarima.net>
2007-07-01 12:42 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-30 16:47 ` Uriel
2007-07-01 23:22 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2007-07-02 0:45 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-07-03 3:50 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2007-07-03 4:09 ` Kris Maglione
2007-07-03 15:10 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-07-03 19:45 ` Federico Benavento
2007-07-03 20:31 ` Jonathan Cast [this message]
2007-07-03 21:14 ` Wes Kussmaul
2007-07-03 21:51 ` Martin Neubauer
2007-07-03 23:16 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-07-04 3:36 ` Iruata Souza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707031531.31042.jcast@ou.edu \
--to=jcast@ou.edu \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
--cc=weigelt@metux.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).