Re: [9fans] Git/fs: Possibly Usable

Re: [9fans] Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[ori]

> Impressive!
>
> I didn't imagine one could implement git in so few lines of C! Thanks for challenging my assumptions!
>
> I'd like to port it to Jehanne but I cannot find a license in the repository, so in theory it's "all rights reserved" under most jurisdictions.
>
> What's your take on this?
>
> Did you intend to put it under public domain instead? Maybe MIT? Or LPL?
>
>
> Giacomo

Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front, but I can relicense it then.

Do you have a preference?

Re: [9fans] Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Giacomo]

On April 3, 2019 4:02:49 PM UTC, ori@eigenstate.org wrote:
>Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front,
>but I can relicense it then.
>
>Do you have a preference?

Probably MIT or a BSD.

But I can also live with any copyleft of your choice.


Giacomo

[9fans] Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Cull]

>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 10:08 AM
>>On April 3, 2019 4:02:49 PM UTC, ori at eigenstate.org wrote:
>>Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front,
>>but I can relicense it then.
>>
>>Do you have a preference?
>?
>Probably MIT or a BSD.
>
>But I can also live with any copyleft of your choice.

Wouldn't BSD (2 clause) be the easiest to reliscence down the road?

[9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Cull]

>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 10:08 AM
>>On April 3, 2019 4:02:49 PM UTC, ori at eigenstate.org wrote:
>>Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front,
>>but I can relicense it then.
>>
>>Do you have a preference?
>?
>Probably MIT or a BSD.
>
>But I can also live with any copyleft of your choice.

Wouldn't BSD (2 clause) be the easiest to reliscence down the road?

Re: [9fans] Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Ori Bernstein]

On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 16:59:22 +0000
Giacomo <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:

> On April 3, 2019 4:02:49 PM UTC, ori@eigenstate.org wrote:
> >Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front,
> >but I can relicense it then.
> >
> >Do you have a preference?
>
> Probably MIT or a BSD.
>
> But I can also live with any copyleft of your choice.
>
>
> Giacomo
>

MIT it is, since it matches the 9front license.

--
Ori Bernstein <ori@eigenstate.org>

Re: [9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[hiro]

no

On 4/3/19, Cull <cull@cock.li> wrote:
>>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 10:08 AM
>>>On April 3, 2019 4:02:49 PM UTC, ori@eigenstate.org wrote:
>>>Don't particularly care. At some point I'd like to commit it to 9front,
>>>but I can relicense it then.
>>>
>>>Do you have a preference?
>>‎
>>Probably MIT or a BSD.
>>
>>But I can also live with any copyleft of your choice.
>
> Wouldn't BSD (2 clause) be the easiest to reliscence down the road?
>
>
>

Re: [9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Kurt H Maier]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:43:55AM -0700, Cull wrote:
>
> Wouldn't BSD (2 clause) be the easiest to reliscence down the road?
>

The copyright holder can relicense at will.

khm

[9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Cull]

>From: Kurt H Maier
>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 11:59 AM
>To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
>
>The copyright holder can relicense at will.
I guess I was thinking moreso if, for some reason, the author didn't (i.e. went MIA or was just lazy).

Cull

[9fans] Fw: Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Cull]

>From: Kurt H Maier
>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 11:59 AM
>To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
>
>The copyright holder can relicense at will.
I guess I was thinking moreso if, for some reason, the author didn't (i.e. went MIA or was just lazy).

Cull
‎

[9fans] Fw: Git/fs: Possibly Usable

[Cull]

>From: hiro
>Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:22 PM
>To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
>
>no

Can you elaborate? 

Cull?