From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] historical clarification
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:55:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <338136843609fdd78da5af4cb2174946@9netics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7871fcf50611072213j7f26456dxb1de74c891c5ad8b@mail.gmail.com>
>> are these two the same paper? any reason for difference in
>> titles?
>
> Compare "Plan 9: The Early Papers" (CSTR #158 at
> <http://plan9.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cstr.html>, or
> <http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/plan9/plan9doc/>) to the newer documents
> in /sys/doc .
unless i'm missing something, it doesn't explain the title difference;
perhaps the second source is wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-08 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-08 5:52 Skip Tavakkolian
2006-11-08 6:13 ` Joel Salomon
2006-11-08 6:55 ` Skip Tavakkolian [this message]
2006-11-08 23:49 ` Joel Salomon
2006-11-09 2:32 ` Skip Tavakkolian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=338136843609fdd78da5af4cb2174946@9netics.com \
--to=9nut@9netics.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).