[9fans] Re: Acid Bug

[9fans] Re: Acid Bug

[Philippe Anel]

> The documentation is wrong, although perhaps the code should be fixed
> to match the documentation rather than the other way around.  In fact,
> I think I'll do that.
>
Ok.

> There is not a good way to add extensions to the builtins.  Coincidentally,
> though, I rewrote itoa() last weekend to make it easier to control the>
> format in which an integer appears.  With the code below you can say,
> besides the old itoa(27), itoa(27, "%x"),  itoa(27, "value is %#.8x"), etc.
> The format string is a general print format that a) must accept ints and
> b) has the sense of %#x inverted.
>
I'll give it a try this weekend.

> I fully acknowledge the utter hackedness of this.  A better idea should
> be employed.
>
Before your answer, I thought about adding a fmtinstall(2) like feature to 
builtins so we can write something like :

-----------------------------------cut-here----------
complex FComplex {
     'g'   0    r;
     'g'   4    i;
}

defn Xconv(addr)
{
     print("[", ((FComplex)addr).r, "," ((FComplex)addr).i, "]");
}

fmtinstall('Y', Xconv);

addr = fmt(addr, 'Y');
-----------------------------------cut-here-----------

But now I feel that it is not worth the effort.

    Philippe,