[9fans] 8c buglet?

[9fans] 8c buglet?

[Petr Cejchan]

Hi,
I encountered this behavior of 8c with // comments:

// I don't know why its a char *, maybe it should be a void *?
     cpp: string too long (or sthg like that...)
/* I don't know why its a char *, maybe it should be a void *? */
     cpp: OK


Cheers,
++pac.

-- 
---
Výhodné nákupy přes internet, slevové akce, zajímavé ceny, dodávka
až do domu...http://shop.volny.cz

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Bruce Ellis]

I thought I'd fixed that.  I guess I didn't spend as much time on //
as I did on /* */ or things are out of sync.

I'll look into it when I get a chance.

brucee (and the Leonids)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Cejchan" <pac7@post.cz>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:20 AM
Subject: [9fans] 8c buglet?


Hi,
I encountered this behavior of 8c with // comments:

// I don't know why its a char *, maybe it should be a void *?
     cpp: string too long (or sthg like that...)
/* I don't know why its a char *, maybe it should be a void *? */
     cpp: OK


Cheers,
++pac.

--
---
V�hodn� n�kupy p�es internet, slevov� akce, zaj�mav� ceny, dod�vka
aďż˝ do domu...http://shop.volny.cz

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Douglas A. Gwyn]

Petr Cejchan wrote:
> I encountered this behavior of 8c with // comments:

Reminds me of Unix's (Reiser) cpp, which had a buffer-
boundary bug such that *occasionally* (maybe 1 time in 200)
a termination */ was not properly detected ans so extra
code was in effect "commented out" during compilation.
We fixed that in the BRL version(s) of Unix, but it
may still have been wrong in some releases of Unix
System V.  (I'd have to check and it doesn't seem worth
doing.)

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Boyd Roberts]

Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:

>Reminds me of Unix's (Reiser) cpp, ...
>
That was a gnarly piece of code.

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Douglas A. Gwyn]

Boyd Roberts wrote:
> That was a gnarly piece of code.

A maze of twisty passages, all not quite right.

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Graham Gallagher]

fast though
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?


> Boyd Roberts wrote:
> > That was a gnarly piece of code.
>
> A maze of twisty passages, all not quite right.
>

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Douglas A. Gwyn]

Graham Gallagher wrote:
> fast though

Yeah, that had something to do with why it was gnarly.
Trying to accomplish everything in a sequential operation
without intermediate buffering..

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Boyd Roberts]

Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:

>Trying to accomplish everything in a sequential operation
>without intermediate buffering..
>
It was a very clever observation, but ...

Re: [9fans] 8c buglet?

[Douglas A. Gwyn]

"Douglas A. Gwyn" wrote:
> (maybe 1 time in 200)

I meant, 1 time in 2000; must have been a sticky 0 key.