venti survery results

venti survery results

[Russ Cox]

The venti surveys have stopped trickling in.  As promised,
here is a summary.

Below is a table summarizing the venti data.
Each line is one server that someone submitted.
I am surprised that there are people out there
with 4+ year old servers.  You take very good care
of your disks.  I suspect that most of the large but new
servers replaced older ones.

Most people who replied had less than 2 million blocks,
and I suspect most people who didn't reply have servers like
the bottom half of the table rather than the top half.
You could keep a million-block index in 50 MB of memory
and do away with the index hash table completely.
It might be worth having venti detect when the index
cache can fit the entire index and operate entirely out
of the cache, without ever needing to read from the
hash table.  You could get much better performance
out of venti doing that, and not even need a bloom filter.
In fact, in that mode you wouldn't even need to configure
an index disk.

Then there are the power users, with their tens or hundreds
of millions of blocks.  One GB of index cache only gets you
thirty million index entries, so these people have essentially
no choice but to maintain the hash table index with its
heavy seek penalties.  Maybe in a few years flash storage will
save the day.

Russ


                        GB     GB    days
   clumps    cclumps    raw   compr  age

 338708170  279714997 1158.6  593.4   681  most clumps
 243894713  207350734 5614.7 1657.2    69  most bytes
 148582718  105977246  447.2  186.5   561
  45255915   23277726  135.0   87.0   169
  27395797   15624078   95.9   62.9     7
  22095841   12085340   78.9   53.4    66
  10194765    6088883   38.8   22.7     -
   7991230    6622335   34.4   17.3  1768
   6618670    2068276   46.2   39.5    60
   6158824    4209478   37.7   21.2  1780
   5971129    4325778   40.4   23.8   361
   5805550    2246660   40.2   30.4    41
   4900543    3749792   23.4   12.2   132
   4151139     274551   31.3   30.4   214
   2465171    1065357   16.3   12.4  1044
   1756289     324119   12.6   11.4  1984  oldest
   1544611      17057   23.4   23.3   359
   1353686     901896    2.4    1.1     -
   1308981     981760    7.3    4.0  1413
   1279725    1073807    7.2    3.1  1544
   1197798     961554    6.8    3.3  1436
   1136953     609235    6.7    4.8   220
   1082686     971796    6.9    1.9  1119
    837292     347263    5.5    4.2   239
    834808     549286    5.3    3.2  1164
    742362     609642    4.1    1.8   490
    641818     457784    3.8    2.2  1631  slowest growth
    279319     222898    1.6    0.8     -
    250992     168172    1.4    0.8   547
    238121     215040    1.4    0.5   268
    213772     183795    1.2    0.5    42
    151431     134091    0.9    0.4   108
    141257     121809    0.8    0.3   208
    122807     105275    0.6    0.3    32
        70         67    0.0    0.0     0  newest

Re: [9fans] venti survery results

[Richard Miller]

> I am surprised that there are people out there
> with 4+ year old servers.  You take very good care
> of your disks.

An arena can be older than the disk it's on -- you can copy
arenas verbatim from an old disk to a new one without changing
the timestamps.

>    641818     457784    3.8    2.2  1631  slowest growth

That's my 7-year-old thinkpad t21, with a 4-year-old venti
store on a 2-year-old disk.  It's my out-and-about machine,
with most of the /usr subtree encrypted and marked '+t', which
is why the arenas grow slowly.  For backup, I use replica/push
to sync with my main fossil/venti machine.

Re: [9fans] venti survery results

[Kernel Panic]

Richard Miller wrote:
>> I am surprised that there are people out there
>> with 4+ year old servers.  You take very good care
>> of your disks.
>>
>
> An arena can be older than the disk it's on -- you can copy
> arenas verbatim from an old disk to a new one without changing
> the timestamps.
>

1756289     324119   12.6   11.4  1984  oldest

That is the case... I wanted to save some power and I migrated from my old
P-II 4x IDE disk server to a tiny VIA C7 2x SATA disk one. They are
always running and are backed up by UPS.

I use always fs mirror for the arena partitions with 2 disks from different
brands. but no luck yet... no disks got bad on these machines so far.

By the way... the VIA machine is the one that got me lots of trouble
with the
SATA until i hacked a bruteforce retry-n-reset-loop in the ide driver,
now works
perfectly stable (84 days uptime for now)

:-)

cinap

Re: [9fans] venti survery results

[Richard Miller]

> the VIA machine is the one that got me lots of trouble
> with the
> SATA until i hacked a bruteforce retry-n-reset-loop in the ide driver,

Me too.  Maybe one of us should submit a patch?

-- Richard

Re: [9fans] venti survery results

[Kernel Panic]

Richard Miller wrote:
>> the VIA machine is the one that got me lots of trouble
>> with the
>> SATA until i hacked a bruteforce retry-n-reset-loop in the ide driver,
>>
>
> Me too.  Maybe one of us should submit a patch?
>
this is the driver that works for me:

http://9hal.ath.cx/usr/cinap_lenrek/viamod/sdata.c
> -- Richard
>
I'm lazy as hell

cinap

Re: [9fans] venti survery results

[erik quanstrom]

>> the VIA machine is the one that got me lots of trouble
>> with the
>> SATA until i hacked a bruteforce retry-n-reset-loop in the ide driver,
>
> Me too.  Maybe one of us should submit a patch?

is this one of the via chipsets that may also be driven as ahci?

ahci should show up with class/subclass/ccrp as 01.06.01.  as in:
x.y.z:	disk 01.06.01 vid/did  11 0:x 16 1:x 16 2:x 16 3:x 16 4:x 16 5:y != 0 1024 (or bigger)

i was just taking a look at the linux driver and it looks like
nvidia and sis should just work.  (anybody with such hardware care to
test?) there were just a couple of tweeks that the linux guys felt
necessary with via, but i didn't look carefully enough to see of they
apply to the plan 9 driver, as i have no hardware.

- erik

[9fans] via vt8237

[erik quanstrom]

i think the posted patch might not be
appropriate for controllers not having
the via controllers' problem as it is quite
quick to reset the controller if a command
takes a long time.  with a properly
functioning controller, it is generally a
bad idea to do a reset with a command in
flight.

i haven't seen any other patches so i don't
know how they work.

i also took a look at the linux driver for
the same hardware and didn't find the same
reset loop.  i did however find some pci
setup code specific to this chipset which
i posted some time ago
	http://9fans.net/archive/2008/02/277
this code was translated from the linux.
i don't know if this was ever tried.  but
it tries to attack the root of the problem,
missed interrupts, by setting some pcie
magic.

i can't try this myself as i don't have
appropriately buggy hardware.

if this doesn't work, it might make sense
to have a controller setting to optionally
check for missed interrupts.

this will allow us to still tell the difference
between an interrupt that got lost and a
controller that's gone off into the weeds.

i've put up a driver that may work if
this is the case but it's not tested due to
lack of hardware.  sources is down, so it
can be accessed here:

	hget http://www.quanstro.net/vtsdata.c

- erik

Re: [9fans] venti survery results

[Richard Miller]

> is this one of the via chipsets that may also be driven as ahci?
>
> ahci should show up with class/subclass/ccrp as 01.06.01.  as in:
> x.y.z:	disk 01.06.01 vid/did  11 0:x 16 1:x 16 2:x 16 3:x 16 4:x 16 5:y != 0 1024 (or bigger)

Depending on whether I select SATA mode = RAID or IDE in the bios,
I get one of these:

0.15.0:	disk 01.04.00 1106/3149  11 0:0000ea01 16 1:0000e001 16 2:0000e101 16 3:0000e201 16 4:0000e301 16 5:0000d801 256
0.15.0:	disk 01.01.8f 1106/3149  11 0:0000ea01 16 1:0000e001 16 2:0000e101 16 3:0000e201 16 4:0000e301 16 5:0000d801 256