9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] Fossil/venti performance (Was:  Sources Gone?)
       [not found] <bc558135619964bf7556b911dd21600e@quanstro.net>
@ 2009-02-03 18:37 ` lucio
  2009-02-03 18:44   ` erik quanstrom
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: lucio @ 2009-02-03 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> i would imagine that cpu has nothing to do with it and encryption
> would add no overhead at all.  i would image that seeks dominate
> your performance numbers.

Well, there are numerous issues.  The machine is a CPU server booting
off another fossil/venti host; it has its own rather pristine, mostly
unused Plan 9 distribution and a few other fossil partitions of which
only one is backed by venti.  I am hesitantly initialising the dump
partition because I'm not convinced I have the efficient direcory
hierarchy I want to live with.

I can't easily check before fossil is active, but venti takes a long
time to start and by the time the machine is "ready", memory is full
and half of swap is in use :-( During "snap -a" load, context
switching and interrupts tend to swing wildly and swap is often being
accessed (it's on IDE and the drive light can only mean swap access, I
do have DMA active :-)

So I would not use this particular configuration to win any
competitions.

In passing, the first time I did this, I powered the machine down a
few times because I was convinced it had stalled.  That might have
been pessimism on my part, because now that I am monitoring it
(stats), it is clear that it occasionally shows no sign of disk
activity (no seek, load in astronomical places) for long periods, only
to proceed again later.

But I do turn all snaptimes to none, which I superstitiously did the
first time and seemed to make a difference (I bet it didn't, but if
anyone suspects that a dump should finish before another starts, I
have the equipment to test the theory.

++L




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] Fossil/venti performance (Was:  Sources Gone?)
  2009-02-03 18:37 ` [9fans] Fossil/venti performance (Was: Sources Gone?) lucio
@ 2009-02-03 18:44   ` erik quanstrom
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: erik quanstrom @ 2009-02-03 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lucio, 9fans

> I can't easily check before fossil is active, but venti takes a long
> time to start and by the time the machine is "ready", memory is full
> and half of swap is in use :-( During "snap -a" load, context
> switching and interrupts tend to swing wildly and swap is often being
> accessed (it's on IDE and the drive light can only mean swap access, I
> do have DMA active :-)

swapping goes nonlinear in a hurry.  how much memory do you have?

- erik




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-03 18:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bc558135619964bf7556b911dd21600e@quanstro.net>
2009-02-03 18:37 ` [9fans] Fossil/venti performance (Was: Sources Gone?) lucio
2009-02-03 18:44   ` erik quanstrom

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).