From: Sean Hinchee <henesy.dev@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc exec error behaviour
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:37:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B14BE0.2040000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b157c8bb44aec67c1446c45563889e9@ghost.attlocal.net>
Go 1.5.1 built and is running on 9Front/amd64 I thought, but doesn't on
9Front/386?
On 02/02/2016 11:11 AM, sl@9front.org wrote:
> I think when people say "works" they mean that tip builds. The
> outstanding bugs with the language on Plan 9 are still outstanding
> (see the open issues), regardless of which Plan 9 you are running.
>
> I think it's great if someone's programs work. I use a few go programs
> (built with go 1.4.2 for both 386 and amd64) daily on 9front without
> problems. That said, go 1.5.x (the language) fails to build on 9front/amd64,
> but seems to build and work as well as 1.4.2 on 9front/386. The crucial
> aspect here is what works and what doesn't work *after* go builds. I think
> some people keep making cracks because some funfamental things remain
> broken in all versions (see the open issues).
>
> People who didn't notice tip no longer builds on some systems may
> (like me) have been content running their existing working binaries.
> Not everyone chases updates unless there is an immediate reason to
> update.
>
> sl
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-30 16:31 cinap_lenrek
2016-01-31 1:16 ` Prof Brucee
2016-01-31 4:20 ` lucio
2016-01-31 6:58 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-01 0:52 ` Sean Hinchee
2016-02-01 4:06 ` erik quanstrom
2016-02-01 4:29 ` lucio
2016-02-01 17:01 ` Richard Miller
2016-02-01 18:35 ` lucio
2016-02-02 1:29 ` Prof Brucee
2016-02-02 10:53 ` Richard Miller
2016-02-02 12:36 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2016-02-02 12:53 ` hiro
2016-02-02 13:23 ` David du Colombier
2016-02-02 15:46 ` lucio
2016-02-02 16:02 ` David du Colombier
2016-02-02 16:46 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-02 16:52 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-02 17:11 ` sl
2016-02-03 0:37 ` Sean Hinchee [this message]
2016-02-03 0:48 ` Kurt H Maier
2016-02-02 17:24 ` sl
2016-02-02 17:33 ` Wes Kussmaul
2016-02-01 20:33 ` [9fans] plan9/arm in Go 1.7? (was: rc exec error behaviour) Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-01 20:45 ` David du Colombier
2016-02-02 4:16 ` [9fans] rc exec error behaviour Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-02-02 4:21 ` Prof Brucee
2016-02-02 4:24 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-02-22 0:19 ` erik quanstrom
2016-02-03 0:48 sl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B14BE0.2040000@gmail.com \
--to=henesy.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).