From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc exec error behaviour
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:53:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XM=L+nFh_P-Ybi0mcSzhKp5bP5Nm3zKxes04_HBPVzXCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEAzY3-GuDUAKbd3FxXtO5q6xBnvAGAVif-dnbffa_bjYE1qzw@mail.gmail.com>
> That serves as a useful test to gauge interest (and quality) in Go on Plan 9.
No, only in Go on 9front. It might be that other people are using
their own version of Plan 9 with Go at the same time. Also, what about
people who just don't think it's worth upgrading cause stuff still
works for them?
I don't get the point about quality.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-30 16:31 cinap_lenrek
2016-01-31 1:16 ` Prof Brucee
2016-01-31 4:20 ` lucio
2016-01-31 6:58 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-01 0:52 ` Sean Hinchee
2016-02-01 4:06 ` erik quanstrom
2016-02-01 4:29 ` lucio
2016-02-01 17:01 ` Richard Miller
2016-02-01 18:35 ` lucio
2016-02-02 1:29 ` Prof Brucee
2016-02-02 10:53 ` Richard Miller
2016-02-02 12:36 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2016-02-02 12:53 ` hiro [this message]
2016-02-02 13:23 ` David du Colombier
2016-02-02 15:46 ` lucio
2016-02-02 16:02 ` David du Colombier
2016-02-02 16:46 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-02 16:52 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-02 17:11 ` sl
2016-02-03 0:37 ` Sean Hinchee
2016-02-03 0:48 ` Kurt H Maier
2016-02-02 17:24 ` sl
2016-02-02 17:33 ` Wes Kussmaul
2016-02-01 20:33 ` [9fans] plan9/arm in Go 1.7? (was: rc exec error behaviour) Skip Tavakkolian
2016-02-01 20:45 ` David du Colombier
2016-02-02 4:16 ` [9fans] rc exec error behaviour Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-02-02 4:21 ` Prof Brucee
2016-02-02 4:24 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-02-22 0:19 ` erik quanstrom
2016-02-03 0:48 sl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFSF3XM=L+nFh_P-Ybi0mcSzhKp5bP5Nm3zKxes04_HBPVzXCw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=23hiro@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).