From: Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Abaco: url parsing problem
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:43:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d375e920712210843i651b74f2haf0c5f05bf33a42c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60712210835x59435cf2u491829e049f0ec61@mail.gmail.com>
If you are looking for obnoxiousness and silliness devoid of any
content I recommend you re-read what you just wrote.
Or you could go and write yet another broken and useless url parsing
implementation.
uriel
On Dec 21, 2007 11:35 AM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2007 7:39 AM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That is why somebody (cough) riped out the url parsing code from webfs
> > and put it into a library, and then updated abaco to use that
> > library... but we all know here code and effort duplication is good,
> > so never mind.
> >
> > uriel
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> One could argue that to the extreme. I've already got windows? Why do I
> need another operating system? I should be happy with my windows, and just
> contribute to that community, that way, all my changes can be viewed and
> used by my fellow windows users.
>
> I mean, if you're going to be pedantic and silly about a concept, why not go
> all the way?
>
> Fragmentation of effort is bad in all cases, or it isn't bad in all cases.
> You can't have both categorically at the same time.
>
> Dave
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-21 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-20 9:37 pavlovetsky
2007-12-20 9:56 ` Federico G. Benavento
2007-12-20 11:22 ` Juan M. Mendez
2007-12-20 18:13 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-12-20 21:22 ` Juan M. Mendez
2007-12-20 21:27 ` Federico G. Benavento
2007-12-21 15:39 ` Uriel
2007-12-21 16:13 ` Kernel Panic
2007-12-21 16:40 ` Uriel
2007-12-21 18:42 ` Juan M. Mendez
2007-12-21 16:35 ` David Leimbach
2007-12-21 16:43 ` Uriel [this message]
2007-12-21 16:55 ` roger peppe
2007-12-21 17:08 ` David Leimbach
2007-12-21 18:16 ` sqweek
2007-12-21 18:02 ` Wes Kussmaul
2007-12-21 18:17 ` ron minnich
2007-12-21 9:39 ` [9fans] " pavlovetsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d375e920712210843i651b74f2haf0c5f05bf33a42c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=uriel99@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).