* [9fans] MAXNAMLEN in ape/dirent.h
@ 2002-10-19 21:05 Skip Tavakkolian
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Skip Tavakkolian @ 2002-10-19 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Shouldn't this value be a higher limit, now that we have 9P2000?
Since most of the time dealing with reallylongfilenames.java happens
under APE, it can be annoying. For example, it causes problems with
ape/sh when using lnfs:
term% ape/sh
$ lnfs /n/kremvax
$ ls -l /n/kremvax
a-r--r--r-- M 459 fst sys 128 Oct 17 23:46 /n/kremvax/.longnames
--r--r--r-- M 459 fst sys 0 Oct 17 23:46 /n/kremvax/alongandboringnameforafile12344
--r--r--r-- M 459 fst sys 0 Oct 17 23:45 /n/kremvax/alongandboringnameforafile12345
--r--r--r-- M 459 fst sys 0 Oct 17 19:27 /n/kremvax/anawfullylongandboringname12344
--r--r--r-- M 459 fst sys 0 Oct 17 19:27 /n/kremvax/anawfullylongandboringname12345
$ ls -l /n/kremvax/anawf*
ls: /n/kremvax/anawfullylongandboringname1: '/n/kremvax/anawfullylongandboringname1' file does not exist
ls: /n/kremvax/anawfullylongandboringname1: '/n/kremvax/anawfullylongandboringname1' file does not exist
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [9fans] MAXNAMLEN in ape/dirent.h
@ 2002-10-20 1:13 presotto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: presotto @ 2002-10-20 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Shouldn't this value be a higher limit, now that we have 9P2000?
Anyone care if I just set it to 127? I don't see that it would break
anything though some globbing might eat up a lot of memory.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-20 1:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-19 21:05 [9fans] MAXNAMLEN in ape/dirent.h Skip Tavakkolian
2002-10-20 1:13 presotto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).