9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [9fans] kernel updates
@ 2002-07-16 20:14 dpx
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dpx @ 2002-07-16 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: presotto, 9fans

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]

Excellent, Thank you! 

I started on window scale option, but never got very far before 
getting side tracked. It would be really great to have.

-dp

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2467 bytes --]

From: presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] kernel updates
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:49:54 -0400
Message-ID: <0113a037afb5d6a94f6fb107a4fadb28@plan9.bell-labs.com>

I've copied a scad of changes onto the sources machine.  In
particular
- I've hacked the hell out of TCP to get rid of
    all the anomalies I could find.
  > The problem LANL was having with throughput
	dropping off drasticly with write size is gone.
  > we no longer do lots of needless retransmissions
  > IP CPU overhead is down (took out some high rollers)
- I've added SYN attack defenses.  I used the low
  state model rather than the SYN cookie one.
- a defense for NAPTHA DOS attacks from Dong Lin.

I don't think I've picked up any works in progress.
I still want to add scalable TCP windows but ran out
of time.  I'll do it in a few weeks.  It might help
with GB ethernet.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] kernel updates
  2002-07-16 19:49 presotto
@ 2002-07-17  8:58 ` Don
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Don @ 2002-07-17  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> - I've added SYN attack defenses.  I used the low
>   state model rather than the SYN cookie one.
>
Thanks, I was actually going to mention something 
about this. I was attacked with two SYN floods
yesterday! :-)
Don


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [9fans] kernel updates
@ 2002-07-16 19:49 presotto
  2002-07-17  8:58 ` Don
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: presotto @ 2002-07-16 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

I've copied a scad of changes onto the sources machine.  In
particular
- I've hacked the hell out of TCP to get rid of
    all the anomalies I could find.
  > The problem LANL was having with throughput
	dropping off drasticly with write size is gone.
  > we no longer do lots of needless retransmissions
  > IP CPU overhead is down (took out some high rollers)
- I've added SYN attack defenses.  I used the low
  state model rather than the SYN cookie one.
- a defense for NAPTHA DOS attacks from Dong Lin.

I don't think I've picked up any works in progress.
I still want to add scalable TCP windows but ran out
of time.  I'll do it in a few weeks.  It might help
with GB ethernet.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-17  8:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-16 20:14 [9fans] kernel updates dpx
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-16 19:49 presotto
2002-07-17  8:58 ` Don

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).