9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Brdline
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:50:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <775b8d190601180950t706e1c9fr5d6a2146ced4ee8a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60601180937i3fe0a0ccyd08750aac72f6aac@mail.gmail.com>

I think - just do it.  The ozinferno "standard" is defined by the
implementation - plus whatever documentation that i get time
to write.  This does not solve larger issues (like standards
for cell phones) but it works for me.  I didn't go to a meeting
to add function pointers, i just did it.

brucee

On 1/19/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/18/06, Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> > how about someone (or two) experts write the standard?
> > worked for K&R.
>
>
> What's worse is standards with no reference implementation. Both C an C99
> seem to have suffered from this disease.
>
> C++ hasn't been implemented as 1998's spec has erm... specified to my
> knowledge without any bugs.  [EDG comes closest and Intel and other compiler
> vendors are just using their front end, and paying for it as a result].
>
> C99 has implementation issues like tgmath.h that are actually impossible to
> implement in just C99.  You absolutely will need compiler extensions to
> implement that header properly.
>
> Perhaps the best way to specify a standard is to define it in a reference
> implementation then talk about it.  Not specify on paper and dream about how
> it should work then find out how far off you were when you start trying to
> prototype it.
>
> Dave
>
> > brucee
> >
> > On 1/19/06, Wes Kussmaul < wes@village.com> wrote:
> > > Paul Lalonde wrote:
> > >
> > > > Standards are for when there are too many cooks in the kitchen. By
> > > > their very nature they have to compromise.
> > > > Give me the work of a standards committee before the the work of a
> > > > single idiot; but most of all give me the work of a brilliant expert
> > > > before that of the committee. And for God's sake, please don't turn my
> > > > expert into an idiot by throwing him onto a committee!
> > >
> > > How about all standards committees advising one individual, the
> > > standards czar, your brilliant expert, with a background in law and
> > > social science as well as technology, who is able to apply duly
> > > constituted public authority to a standard. He/she cannot have any
> > > alliances with anyone but the ITU.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Wes Kussmaul
> > > CIO
> > > The Village Group
> > > 738 Main Street
> > > Waltham, MA 02451
> > >
> > > 781-647-7178
> > >
> > >
> > > My uncle likes to say that the world's biggest troubles started when the
> serpent said, "Try this fruit, and by the way if a bunch of people
> collectively calling themselves Arthur Andersen signs something it's the
> same as if a person named Arthur Andersen signed it." I don't get the
> serpent and fruit part. Must be some Swiss mythology thing. He can be a bit
> obscure.
> > >
> > >                         P.K. Iggy
> > >                         _How I Like Fixed The Internet_
> > >                           (Tales from the Great Infodepression of 2009
> > >                           and the prosperity that followed)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-18 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-16 11:35 Gorka guardiola
2006-01-16 12:30 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-16 13:27   ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-16 13:37     ` Gorka guardiola
2006-01-16 13:57       ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-16 14:24         ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-17  0:56         ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-17  1:35           ` Russ Cox
2006-01-17  1:42             ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-17  1:47               ` Russ Cox
2006-01-17 10:01               ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-17 16:45                 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18  5:38                   ` Simon Williams
2006-01-18  5:49                     ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18  5:54                     ` Paul Lalonde
2006-01-18  6:11                       ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18 14:25                         ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18 15:26                           ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-18 23:06                             ` Adrian Tritschler
2006-01-19  1:20                               ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18 15:45                         ` Paul Lalonde
2006-01-18 16:41                           ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18 16:47                           ` Wes Kussmaul
2006-01-18 16:57                             ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18 17:37                               ` David Leimbach
2006-01-18 17:50                                 ` Bruce Ellis [this message]
2006-01-18 18:00                               ` Sape Mullender
2006-01-18 17:01                             ` Paul Lalonde
2006-01-18 17:30                               ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-18 18:04                               ` Wes Kussmaul
2006-01-18 20:22                                 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-01-18 20:31                                   ` andrey mirtchovski
2006-01-18 23:01                                     ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-18 22:56                                   ` Joel Salomon
2006-01-18 15:25                       ` Brantley Coile
2006-01-18 16:35                         ` Paul Lalonde
2006-01-17  9:59             ` [9fans] ulong Charles Forsyth
2006-01-17 12:30               ` Russ Cox
2006-01-17 16:55                 ` Bruce Ellis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-02  0:37 [9fans] Brdline arisawa
2005-02-02  1:06 ` Russ Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=775b8d190601180950t706e1c9fr5d6a2146ced4ee8a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bruce.ellis@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).