Re: [9fans] clarification needed

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Bruce Ellis]

You bet your ass. You're not playing with children here!

No-one listens to me though.

I should retire again.

brucee

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM,  <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> Are you? Native? With wireless?
>
> --jim

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[jmk]

Since I have only recently come out of retirement I'd like details.

On Thu Feb 19 00:45:28 EST 2009, bruce.ellis@gmail.com wrote:
> You bet your ass. You're not playing with children here!
>
> No-one listens to me though.
>
> I should retire again.
>
> brucee
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM,  <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> > Are you? Native? With wireless?
> >
> > --jim

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Andrew Simmons]

Is this exchange part of the script for the forthcoming reality TV
show "Harold and Kumar go to Murray Hill" ?

2009/2/20  <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com>:
> Since I have only recently come out of retirement I'd like details.
>
> On Thu Feb 19 00:45:28 EST 2009, bruce.ellis@gmail.com wrote:
>> You bet your ass. You're not playing with children here!
>>
>> No-one listens to me though.
>>
>> I should retire again.
>>
>> brucee
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM,  <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> > Are you? Native? With wireless?
>> >
>> > --jim
>
>

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[andrey mirtchovski]

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Simmons <kodogo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this exchange part of the script for the forthcoming reality TV
> show "Harold and Kumar go to Murray Hill" ?

your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic:

http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/harold_and_kumar_go_to_white_castle__1_.jpg

but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans.

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Andrew Simmons]

> but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans.
>
Evelyn Waugh wrote about "a senile itch to write to The Times".
Perhaps posting to 9fans is a modern equivalent, at least for people
of my generation.

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Dan Cross]

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, andrey mirtchovski
<mirtchovski@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Simmons <kodogo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is this exchange part of the script for the forthcoming reality TV
>> show "Harold and Kumar go to Murray Hill" ?
>
> your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic:
>
> http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/harold_and_kumar_go_to_white_castle__1_.jpg
>
> but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans.

Dude.  I will PAY you money....

        - Dan C.

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[erik quanstrom]

> > your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic:
> >
> > http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/harold_and_kumar_go_to_white_castle__1_.jpg
> >
> > but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans.
>
> Dude.  I will PAY you money....

does that go double for harold and kumar escape from gitmo?
by the way, which one's kumar?

- erik

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Andrew Simmons]

> by the way, which one's kumar?
>
Kumar is the one with nice pubes.

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[John Waters]

I need to think/write up a command that I can name "nph"

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Andrew Simmons <kodogo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> by the way, which one's kumar?
>>
> Kumar is the one with nice pubes.
>
>

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Bruce Ellis]

i did have mypube.com registered for a year ... cross between the obvious.

the hosting dudes thought it was funny but wanted me to call them
personally (in the US) to make sure i wasn't doing a porno site.

they had all of their employees listening annd laughing.

and the conclusive response was from me ... "I'm not gonna sent you
one of mine, please don't send me one of yours" ... much hillarity on
the end of the phone.

sorry,

i'm at the pub.

brucee

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Simmons <kodogo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> by the way, which one's kumar?
>>
> Kumar is the one with nice pubes.
>
>

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[balaji]

weren't you blissfully semi retired?

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> You bet your ass. You're not playing with children here!
>
> No-one listens to me though.
>
> I should retire again.
>
> brucee
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM,  <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> Are you? Native? With wireless?
>>
>> --jim
>
>

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Akshat Kumar]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 52 bytes --]

I'm Kumar.

Also, the one that isn't Harold.
ak

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2799 bytes --]

From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] clarification needed
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:52:33 -0500
Message-ID: <1fa80392544017239a31ce639e97a214@quanstro.net>

> > your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic:
> >
> > http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/harold_and_kumar_go_to_white_castle__1_.jpg
> >
> > but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans.
>
> Dude.  I will PAY you money....

does that go double for harold and kumar escape from gitmo?
by the way, which one's kumar?

- erik

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

[Bruce Ellis]

Wow give me a break! Being semi-retired is hard work! I'm just back
from Brazil after attending the blissful wedding of fgb and his fine
better-half. And I get back to this ...

http://www.bowlarama.com.au/

I'll be back with a trip report and some technical details.

brucee

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Akshat Kumar
<akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
> I'm Kumar.
>
> Also, the one that isn't Harold.
> ak
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
> To: 9fans@9fans.net
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:52:33 -0500
> Subject: Re: [9fans] clarification needed
>> > your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic:
>> >
>> > http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/harold_and_kumar_go_to_white_castle__1_.jpg
>> >
>> > but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans.
>>
>> Dude.  I will PAY you money....
>
> does that go double for harold and kumar escape from gitmo?
> by the way, which one's kumar?
>
> - erik
>
>