9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] C compiler bug?
@ 2005-02-08  9:37 Richard Miller
  2005-02-08  9:44 ` geoff
  2005-02-08 15:08 ` C H Forsyth
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Miller @ 2005-02-08  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Or misunderstanding?

term% cat t.c
#define STRING "//foo"

main()
{
	print(STRING);
}
term% 8c t.c
t.c:6 newline in string
t.c:6 syntax error, last name: "<string>"
term%



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] C compiler bug?
  2005-02-08  9:37 [9fans] C compiler bug? Richard Miller
@ 2005-02-08  9:44 ` geoff
  2005-02-08 15:08 ` C H Forsyth
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: geoff @ 2005-02-08  9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Looks like a bug to me, but `8c -p t.c' will work around it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] C compiler bug?
  2005-02-08  9:37 [9fans] C compiler bug? Richard Miller
  2005-02-08  9:44 ` geoff
@ 2005-02-08 15:08 ` C H Forsyth
  2005-02-08 15:43   ` Lucio De Re
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: C H Forsyth @ 2005-02-08 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 34 bytes --]

i think i've got a fix for that.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2213 bytes --]

From: Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] C compiler bug?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:37:23 0000
Message-ID: <4d95201587124bf36889be11b7effcce@hamnavoe.com>

Or misunderstanding?

term% cat t.c
#define STRING "//foo"

main()
{
	print(STRING);
}
term% 8c t.c
t.c:6 newline in string
t.c:6 syntax error, last name: "<string>"
term%

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] C compiler bug?
  2005-02-08 15:08 ` C H Forsyth
@ 2005-02-08 15:43   ` Lucio De Re
  2005-02-08 19:55     ` Bruce Ellis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2005-02-08 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

> i think i've got a fix for that.

Maybe I'm out of sync, but i recently used 8c and it barfed on the

	// abc'ed

construct.  I seem to recall brucee commenting on it, is that fixed
yet?

++L



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] C compiler bug?
  2005-02-08 15:43   ` Lucio De Re
@ 2005-02-08 19:55     ` Bruce Ellis
  2005-02-08 22:50       ` Charles Forsyth
  2005-02-09  5:28       ` Lucio De Re
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ellis @ 2005-02-08 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lucio De Re, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs

i thought i'd fixed that.

hmmm.  will check

brucee

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:43:29 +0200, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
> > i think i've got a fix for that.
>
> Maybe I'm out of sync, but i recently used 8c and it barfed on the
>
>        // abc'ed
>
> construct.  I seem to recall brucee commenting on it, is that fixed
> yet?
>
> ++L
>
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] C compiler bug?
  2005-02-08 19:55     ` Bruce Ellis
@ 2005-02-08 22:50       ` Charles Forsyth
  2005-02-09  5:28       ` Lucio De Re
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Charles Forsyth @ 2005-02-08 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bruce.ellis, 9fans

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 96 bytes --]

i thought it was fixed.  it seemed to be, when i checked earlier.
but i've been wrong before.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3342 bytes --]

From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [9fans] C compiler bug?
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:55:40 +1100
Message-ID: <775b8d190502081155e1c4730@mail.gmail.com>

i thought i'd fixed that.

hmmm.  will check

brucee

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:43:29 +0200, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
> > i think i've got a fix for that.
>
> Maybe I'm out of sync, but i recently used 8c and it barfed on the
>
>        // abc'ed
>
> construct.  I seem to recall brucee commenting on it, is that fixed
> yet?
>
> ++L
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] C compiler bug?
  2005-02-08 19:55     ` Bruce Ellis
  2005-02-08 22:50       ` Charles Forsyth
@ 2005-02-09  5:28       ` Lucio De Re
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2005-02-09  5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bruce.ellis, 9fans

> i thought i'd fixed that.

I may be out of sync, although I wouldn't have raised the issue
without some motivation.  I do remember you suggesting that a solution
existed.

Sorry if it's a red herring.

++L



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-09  5:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-08  9:37 [9fans] C compiler bug? Richard Miller
2005-02-08  9:44 ` geoff
2005-02-08 15:08 ` C H Forsyth
2005-02-08 15:43   ` Lucio De Re
2005-02-08 19:55     ` Bruce Ellis
2005-02-08 22:50       ` Charles Forsyth
2005-02-09  5:28       ` Lucio De Re

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).