Re: [9fans] Compiling ken-cc on Linux

[Ryan Gonzalez <rymg19@gmail.com>]

On November 26, 2015 3:56:44 PM CST, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 26 November 2015 at 21:51, Charles Forsyth
><charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On 26 November 2015 at 21:49, Ryan Gonzalez <rymg19@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All that is bad...but glibc is worse. The issue is that you kinda
>*have*
>>> to use it,
>>
>>
>> true, very true.
>
>
>i remember glibc being my first instance of having to buy a bigger
>drive
>just to build the thing.
>with clang+llvm, I revisited that, and also had to buy more RAM and
>CPU.

I remember the time I was trying to build LLVM+Clang on Windows in debug mode. Because...MinGW...I actually surpassed the file size limit when linking Clang, so I had to rebuild EVERYTHING. Stupid thing took about an hour each time.

Because MinGW.

>i wondered whether to have a cron entry to speak "WTF?" into /dev/audio
>every so often, to save my voice
>(cron would be good because it could switch to "blistering barnacles!"
>when
>children were present).

It would be so funny if it malfunctioned:

WTF barnacles!
blistering WTF?
-- 
Sent from my Nexus 5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.