From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] file server speed
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:02:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <837E7495-BA88-444B-AB4E-F6B98D839B69@9srv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a342849135a77d556cdcf7f2b31c0c0d@jitaku.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 453 bytes --]
On Jul 15, 2014, at 2:13 , kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> I've experienced three kinds of Plan9 file servers,
> Lab's one, 9atom and plan9front.
Can you clarify which file server, specifically, you're comparing for each of these? The Labs doesn't distribute kenfs any more, and venti+fossil is a very different model. The old kenfs should reliably trounce it on performance. Then there's newer options in both 9atom and 9front.
Anthony
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 169 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-15 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 6:13 kokamoto
2014-07-15 13:02 ` Anthony Sorace [this message]
2014-07-15 16:30 ` cinap_lenrek
2014-07-15 16:56 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-16 0:04 ` kokamoto
2014-07-16 0:36 ` kokamoto
2014-07-16 17:26 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-16 14:23 ` Steven Stallion
2014-07-16 14:53 ` Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
2014-07-17 1:13 ` Steven Stallion
2014-07-17 17:13 ` Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
2014-07-17 21:44 ` cam
2014-07-16 17:41 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-16 23:15 ` kokamoto
2014-07-17 0:29 ` Steven Stallion
2014-07-17 0:31 ` Steven Stallion
2014-07-17 1:10 ` john francis lee
2014-07-17 1:09 ` john francis lee
2014-07-17 1:10 ` Bakul Shah
2014-07-17 16:56 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-17 18:14 ` Bakul Shah
2014-07-17 18:39 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-17 19:01 ` Bakul Shah
2014-07-17 19:10 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-17 19:26 ` Bakul Shah
2014-07-16 17:23 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-16 23:01 ` kokamoto
2014-07-17 17:03 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-18 16:50 ` hiro
2014-07-18 19:36 ` erik quanstrom
2014-07-18 20:11 ` Bakul Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=837E7495-BA88-444B-AB4E-F6B98D839B69@9srv.net \
--to=a@9srv.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).