From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:39:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40904201139w41694272o397939296b291fa5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c22175ab60f8a5ae2cf894d462b29e5@9netics.com>
I did the experiment, for the o/live, of issuing multiple (9p) RPCs
in parallel, without waiting for answers.
In general it was not enough, because in the end the client had to block
and wait for the file to come before looking at it to issue further rpcs.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
>> 9p is efficient as long as your latency is <30ms
>
> check out ken's answer to a question by sqweek. the question
> starts: "With cross-continental round trip times, 9p has a hard time
> competing (in terms of throughput) against less general protocols like
> HTTP. ..."
>
> http://moderator.appspot.com/#15/e=c9&t=2d
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-20 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-17 22:08 Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-04-17 22:15 ` ron minnich
2009-04-17 22:35 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-17 23:01 ` ron minnich
2009-04-18 2:06 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 2:39 ` ron minnich
2009-04-18 2:43 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 5:55 ` lucio
2009-04-18 3:37 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 4:04 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 4:16 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 5:57 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 13:50 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 14:53 ` lucio
2009-04-18 15:07 ` ron minnich
2009-04-18 15:11 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 16:13 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 16:10 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 16:20 ` ron minnich
2009-04-18 16:26 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 16:36 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 16:53 ` tlaronde
2009-04-18 17:12 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-04-18 17:37 ` ron minnich
2009-04-18 23:31 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-04-18 23:26 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 17:35 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 5:58 ` lucio
2009-04-18 11:59 ` tlaronde
2009-04-18 14:31 ` tlaronde
2009-04-18 15:05 ` ron minnich
2009-04-18 15:33 ` tlaronde
2009-04-23 16:56 ` tlaronde
2009-04-24 15:33 ` ron minnich
2009-04-24 16:43 ` tlaronde
2009-04-18 15:16 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2009-04-19 19:34 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-04-19 19:52 ` ron minnich
2009-04-19 7:12 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-04-19 15:26 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-20 2:14 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-04-20 14:58 ` Uriel
2009-04-20 17:18 ` maht
2009-04-20 18:15 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-20 18:30 ` maht
2009-04-20 19:02 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-04-20 18:03 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-04-20 18:07 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-23 5:07 ` sqweek
2009-04-23 5:36 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-04-23 11:51 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 18:18 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-20 18:35 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 18:55 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-20 19:03 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 20:17 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-20 20:33 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 21:18 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-20 21:28 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-04-21 8:19 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 12:00 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 16:52 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-21 17:06 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 17:11 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-21 7:38 ` Bakul Shah
2009-04-20 19:13 ` Steve Simon
2009-04-20 19:22 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 18:39 ` Francisco J Ballesteros [this message]
2009-04-21 9:52 ` maht
2009-04-21 10:23 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 12:04 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-21 14:03 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 14:09 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-21 14:33 ` Fco. J. Ballesteros
2009-04-21 14:50 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-21 16:03 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 16:09 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-21 17:12 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 17:43 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-21 18:14 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 16:38 ` Bakul Shah
2009-04-21 16:59 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 16:10 ` Bakul Shah
2009-04-21 16:25 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-21 17:03 ` David Leimbach
2009-04-21 17:23 ` roger peppe
2009-04-21 16:53 ` David Leimbach
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-17 16:32 [9fans] VMs, etc. (was: Re: security questions) blstuart
2009-04-17 19:16 ` [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years Steve Simon
2009-04-17 19:39 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-17 19:43 ` tlaronde
2009-04-17 19:56 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-17 20:14 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-04-17 20:18 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2009-04-18 4:26 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-17 20:29 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 3:56 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 4:12 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 4:16 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-18 5:51 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-18 12:52 ` Steve Simon
2009-04-17 20:20 ` John Barham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ccc8ba40904201139w41694272o397939296b291fa5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nemo@lsub.org \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).