[9fans] new sources

[9fans] new sources

[geoff]

I've got a replacement for sources set up.  It's a new machine (an
Intel Core 2) named haggis.cs.bell-labs.com and should look like a
slightly-old copy of sources.

Please try it out and see if it looks like sources from your
perspective.  You may want to change your authdom declaration for
outside.plan9.bell-labs.com in /lib/ndb to

	auth=haggis.cs.bell-labs.com authdom=outside.plan9.bell-labs.com

while you try out haggis.  If it checks out, I'll replace its copy of
the sources fossil with a brand-new snapshot from a fresh dump of
sources, so don't store anything precious on haggis during this
check-out period.  Please mail reports, good or bad, to me, not 9fans;
there's no need to add to the volume of traffic on 9fans for this.

Re: [9fans] new sources

[Lyndon Nerenberg - VE6BBM/VE7TFX]

> Please try it out and see if it looks like sources from your
> perspective.  You may want to change your authdom declaration for
> outside.plan9.bell-labs.com in /lib/ndb to

Geoff, I did a walk of /n/sources/contrib and /n/haggis/contrib,
and the latter is missing quite a few files:

  48257   48260 2624325 contrib
  41701   41704 2260692 haggis
  89958   89964 4885017 total

Which could be because you haven't synced the current contrib tree.

I don't see any difference in performance between the two (from
roughly 92 milliseconds away on the net).

--lyndon

Re: [9fans] new sources

[Lyndon Nerenberg - VE6BBM/VE7TFX]

> Please mail reports, good or bad, to me, not 9fans;
> there's no need to add to the volume of traffic on 9fans for this.

How about we convince the mailing list software to stop
inserting Reply-To headers.

Re: [9fans] new sources

[Charles Forsyth]

>How about we convince the mailing list software to stop
>inserting Reply-To headers.

please don't. it's a list, with reply to the list.