* [9fans] unhide and current
@ 2003-12-12 14:05 Gorka Guardiola Múzquiz
2003-12-12 16:09 ` Rob Pike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gorka Guardiola Múzquiz @ 2003-12-12 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I have been playing with a virtual desktop setting using the
mechanisms rio provides. I am not sure it is a good idea, but while
writing it I got accross this. What is the reason behind an unhide
command written to /dev/wsys/n/wctl setting the current window?.
Given there is a current command, wouldn't it be much general to do
that explicitly?.
Gorka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] unhide and current
2003-12-12 14:05 [9fans] unhide and current Gorka Guardiola Múzquiz
@ 2003-12-12 16:09 ` Rob Pike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rob Pike @ 2003-12-12 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> I have been playing with a virtual desktop setting using the
> mechanisms rio provides. I am not sure it is a good idea, but while
> writing it I got accross this. What is the reason behind an unhide
> command written to /dev/wsys/n/wctl setting the current window?.
> Given there is a current command, wouldn't it be much general to do
> that explicitly?.
the only reason was consistency with the menu interface. feel free
to play.
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-12 16:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-12 14:05 [9fans] unhide and current Gorka Guardiola Múzquiz
2003-12-12 16:09 ` Rob Pike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).