* [9fans] Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next?
[not found] ` <3A47C072.3A85D69F@sierratel.com>
@ 2001-01-02 17:38 ` israel raj thomas
2001-01-03 9:43 ` Jason Bowen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: israel raj thomas @ 2001-01-02 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>> The reality is that nowdays, there is a range of operating systems now
>> ( NT, 2000Pro , 2000Server , 2000 Advanced Server, NetBSD, OpenBSD,
>> Inferno or even Linux that routinely whip OS/2's ass.
>
>You are obviously an idiot. NT, 2000Pro, 2000Server, 2000Advanced
>Server, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Linux do not whip OS/2 ass in any way
>whatsoever, really.
You have obviously not used any of them.
Try downloading and running FreeBSD or Linux.
> OS/2 can multitask and multithread better than any OS on the
>list.
In your dreams !
cdrom.com used to handle 500 simultaneuous ftps transfers using just a
P2 500 running FreeBSD. ( They have upgraded since )
Here is a quote from them:
"Recent benchmark results running BSD/OS on Intel 486/66 processors
show speeds faster than a Sun SPARCStation II running Solaris. The
Pentium processor compares favorably with Sun SS10 when running BSD ".
>> Inferno is a virtual operating system with a virtual filesystem and a
>> virtual machine.
>Would like to learn more about it.
http://www.vitanuova.com/
For information about Plan 9 and Inferno.
Inferno can even run on a PDA.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next?
2001-01-02 17:38 ` [9fans] Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? israel raj thomas
@ 2001-01-03 9:43 ` Jason Bowen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Bowen @ 2001-01-03 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
In article <c2nf4tce2niqt8q3p75jr90p2s4sapgqqa@4ax.com>,
israel raj thomas <israelt@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>> The reality is that nowdays, there is a range of operating systems now
>>> ( NT, 2000Pro , 2000Server , 2000 Advanced Server, NetBSD, OpenBSD,
>>> Inferno or even Linux that routinely whip OS/2's ass.
>>
>>You are obviously an idiot. NT, 2000Pro, 2000Server, 2000Advanced
>>Server, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Linux do not whip OS/2 ass in any way
>>whatsoever, really.
>
>You have obviously not used any of them.
>Try downloading and running FreeBSD or Linux.
>
>> OS/2 can multitask and multithread better than any OS on the
>>list.
>
>In your dreams !
>cdrom.com used to handle 500 simultaneuous ftps transfers using just a
^^^ that was 5000
>P2 500 running FreeBSD. ( They have upgraded since )
>Here is a quote from them:
>"Recent benchmark results running BSD/OS on Intel 486/66 processors
>show speeds faster than a Sun SPARCStation II running Solaris. The
>Pentium processor compares favorably with Sun SS10 when running BSD ".
>
>
>>> Inferno is a virtual operating system with a virtual filesystem and a
>>> virtual machine.
>>Would like to learn more about it.
>
>http://www.vitanuova.com/
>For information about Plan 9 and Inferno.
>Inferno can even run on a PDA.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-01-03 9:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Chameleon.1001225072544.leea@FRED>
[not found] ` <qibf4t0i75e3at40f4kr7661mco9fjdnrf@4ax.com>
[not found] ` <3A47C072.3A85D69F@sierratel.com>
2001-01-02 17:38 ` [9fans] Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? israel raj thomas
2001-01-03 9:43 ` Jason Bowen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).