From: Gorka Guardiola <paurea@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p vs http
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:15:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinuwotdp-c82xUBshPeDA5i-BjCqmUB5BsabZGZ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0kco1KJUa8PVGe6pEFSVi+8q95WVd+yP6puij@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Gorka Guardiola <paurea@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Sam Watkins <sam@nipl.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:20:00PM -0500, John Floren wrote:
>>> Please see lsub's Op and my Streaming talk at the most recent IWP9.
>>
>> Ok, thanks. I did not know that 9p has latency problems even when reading a
>> single file. I was talking about pipelining, where you can ask the server to
>> send a dozen files or chunks all of metadata all in a single packet. As I
>> said, I think this might be useful even within a site.
>>
>> Do you think http has any disadvantages compared to 9p?
>
> Permissions, namespaces...
By namespaces I mean qid's , the notion that a file is the same if the
name isn't.
--
- curiosity sKilled the cat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-15 3:25 Sam Watkins
2010-11-15 4:20 ` John Floren
2010-11-15 4:26 ` Bruce Ellis
2010-11-15 5:16 ` Sam Watkins
2010-11-15 5:26 ` John Floren
2010-11-15 14:09 ` Gorka Guardiola
2010-11-15 14:15 ` Gorka Guardiola [this message]
2010-11-15 15:37 ` roger peppe
2010-11-15 16:45 ` C H Forsyth
2010-11-15 16:37 ` roger peppe
2010-11-15 16:48 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-15 17:02 ` roger peppe
2010-11-15 19:29 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-15 21:38 ` roger peppe
2010-11-16 1:18 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-16 12:12 ` roger peppe
2010-11-16 15:56 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-11-16 16:04 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-16 16:32 ` Charles Forsyth
2010-11-16 17:11 ` roger peppe
2010-11-15 15:44 ` David Leimbach
2010-11-15 15:55 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2010-11-15 15:57 ` David Leimbach
2010-11-15 18:44 ` Russ Cox
2010-11-15 19:00 ` Dan Adkins
2010-11-15 22:18 ` Yaroslav
2010-11-15 22:34 ` erik quanstrom
2010-11-16 12:42 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTinuwotdp-c82xUBshPeDA5i-BjCqmUB5BsabZGZ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paurea@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).