9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Harvey OS: A new OS inspired heavily by Plan 9
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:54:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XPM_0wVsmKDwoYGXHyzxFi2qGQykFo_RcEfZZZH+y4X_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37f54ed1-6dfd-4521-94e1-f2bb01dfe5c3@email.android.com>

Who claimed fast compilation was a motive?
>From what I understand this is all about being able to use gdb for debugging.

It makes sense to me, but it might still be subjective.
If you care I will explain my experience:

Some longer time ago I tried gdb for disassembling some secret binary,
but quickly gave up cause of the complex interface and reverted to
objdump instead. I wasted a lot of time and that made me hate gdb a
lot.

Now, much later I started using gdb again, cause as long as it has
access to the source analyzing coredumps is very easy. It's a better
workflow than my printf() debugging, because the Makefiles of the
project I'm working on are so complex and broken that everybody avoids
compiling (takes too long).
I have seen many complaints in Ron's commit logs about makefiles, too.
I'm fairly certain that for Harvey and Akaros they're pretty much
forced just like me into a coredump-driven development workflow.

tldr: gcc is needed so that we can use gdb so that we don't have to
compile as often so that we can fix bugs faster.

On 7/26/15, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> just speaking for myself, I found the fact that plan 9 was a self contained
> thing to be a must have.  i don't consider the gcc toolchain to be a
> feature.
>
> if "fast compilation" is a feature over plan 9, I'd like to see some
> numbers.
>
> - erik
>
> On Jul 25, 2015 3:15 PM, Axel Belinfante
> <[?&cs=wh&v=b&to=axel.belinfante@utwente.nl]axel.belinfante@utwente.nl>
> wrote:
>>
>> I couldn’t resist looking, and found
>> in [http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.osnews.com%2Fcomments%2F28699&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGHKFWanYoFNYbSy6In7LAXtMi-tg]http://www.osnews.com/comments/28699
>>
>> "Harvey is an effort to get the Plan 9 code working with gcc and clang”.
>>
>> So, in a way it seems to be a port of Plan 9.
>>
>> More details, including the feature list below, are
>> at [http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fharvey-os.org&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNErZ4XfGFvsgbhV-uqEiG8K2pSdYQ]http://harvey-os.org
>>
>> Features
>>
>> • AMD 64 bit
>> • Modern, simplified syscall system
>> • GCC toolchain means you can use gdb(!)
>> • Compile in Linux or OSX using Harvey's headers and libs, no need to
>> change anything else
>> • Fast compilation of the whole system
>> • All Plan9 userland apps available
>> • Plans to add X11 with rio-like multiplexing, tty driver, new fileserver,
>> native toolchain and more
>>
>> I’m intrigued by the “compile … using Harvey's headers and libs, no need
>> to change anything else” —
>> I guess that means that it will be easy to “port” stuff to Harvey?
>>
>> The team list contains names well-known on this list...
>>
>> I must say, it looks quite interesting, worth checking out.
>>
>> Axel.
>>
>>> On 25 Jul 2015, at 17:58, Ryan Gonzalez
>>> <[?&cs=wh&v=b&to=rymg19@gmail.com]rymg19@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>> No clue. I'm guessing it's heavily inspired by Plan 9.
>>
>> On July 25, 2015 3:34:13 AM CDT,
>> "[?&cs=wh&v=b&to=steve@quintile.net]steve@quintile.net"
>> <[?&cs=wh&v=b&to=steve@quintile.net]steve@quintile.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> not sure what Harvey is... is it just plan9 ported to build on gcc?
>>>
>>> if so does gcc run under Harvey?
>>>
>>> does gcc run under plan9 now?
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Jul 2015, at 01:43, Ryan Gonzalez
>>> <[?&cs=wh&v=b&to=rymg19@gmail.com]rymg19@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fthis-is-not-a-monad-tutorial%2Fharvey-an-operating-system-with-plan-9-s-shadow-3081414e5f0b&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFKZSymwu8nNoZ6I7kp6PyVvp9A1g]https://medium.com/this-is-not-a-monad-tutorial/harvey-an-operating-system-with-plan-9-s-shadow-3081414e5f0b
>>>>
>>>> I'm not affiliated with this whatsoever; I just saw it on Reddit and
>>>> found it interesting.
>>>>
>>>> I found this part particularly neat:
>>>>
>>>> > We are working in ANSI POSIX environment to have most of well known
>>>> > tools and programs that programmers or end users expects to have in a
>>>> > modern operating system. Things that for traditional Plan 9 would be
>>>> > very difficult to have.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from my Nexus 5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Nexus 5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-26 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-25  0:43 Ryan Gonzalez
2015-07-25  8:34 ` steve
2015-07-25 15:58   ` Ryan Gonzalez
2015-07-25 22:15     ` Axel Belinfante
2015-07-25 22:46       ` Rob Pike
2015-07-26  0:20       ` Prof Brucee
2015-07-26  9:35       ` a.regenfuss
2015-07-26 11:01         ` steve
2015-07-26 12:08           ` Prof Brucee
2015-07-26 15:50             ` Anthony Martin
2015-07-26 17:33       ` erik quanstrom
2015-07-26 17:54         ` hiro [this message]
2015-07-26 18:01           ` Ryan Gonzalez
2015-07-26 19:52           ` erik quanstrom
2015-07-26 20:02             ` Prof Brucee
2015-07-26 17:58         ` Charles Forsyth
2015-07-26 18:22           ` Charles Forsyth
2015-07-26 20:13         ` steve
2015-07-26 20:47           ` hiro
2015-07-26 20:50             ` erik quanstrom
2015-07-26 20:59               ` hiro
2015-07-27  2:18                 ` erik quanstrom
2015-07-27  9:06                   ` hiro
2015-07-27 12:08                     ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2015-07-27 13:44                       ` Charles Forsyth
2015-07-27 14:09                         ` Charles Forsyth
2015-07-27 14:19                   ` Anthony Sorace
2015-07-27 14:31                     ` Charles Forsyth
2015-07-27 15:13                       ` Stanley Lieber
2015-07-27 15:03                     ` Ryan Gonzalez
2015-07-27 20:03                       ` Nicolas Bercher
2015-07-27 15:24 ` Daniel Valio
2015-07-27 15:28   ` lucio
2015-07-27 16:48   ` Ryan Gonzalez
2015-07-27 21:33     ` Daniel Valio
2015-07-27 21:42       ` Skip Tavakkolian
2015-07-27 21:44         ` Skip Tavakkolian
2015-07-28  1:12           ` Giacomo Tesio
2015-07-28 14:26         ` Mauro Rezzonico
2015-07-27 15:14 lucio
2015-07-27 15:31 ` hiro
2015-07-27 15:36   ` lucio
2015-07-27 21:37     ` hiro
2015-07-28  5:01       ` lucio
2015-07-28  5:29       ` lucio
2015-07-28  1:49 Daryl M
2015-07-28 12:58 ` Daniel Valio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFSF3XPM_0wVsmKDwoYGXHyzxFi2qGQykFo_RcEfZZZH+y4X_w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=23hiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).