9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [9fans] gcc
@ 2013-03-24  2:45 Winston Kodogo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Winston Kodogo @ 2013-03-24  2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

I regret that you regret responding, and hope that you will relent.
It's always refreshing to hear from curmudgeons with quite a few more
clues than oneself.  I'm not sure if I'm the public exactly, but I do
find mk and make too labour-intensive for my tastes.  I'm now an IDE
kind of guy, having started out using Fortran IV on a 300 baud
teletype as a contemporary of Barmy Shoestring, and having moved on to
Microsoft Visual Studio, which, in its 2008 incarnation, the last good
one, I actually liked. So shoot me. But I've also learnt to value the
terseness of the command line, and have been, in many ways, vastly
more productive using tips on this list, and also from "The Unix
Programming Environment". Each to their own - there is no one set of
tools that suits everyone. Xcode increasingly works for me. And how
many of the youth have read Fowler?

> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:43:24 -0700
> From: Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com>
> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
> Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc not an option for Plan9
> Message-ID:
>         <CAKzdPgxqU230QEku_rcUPgmE0SoQ1nee+wOYe0TzZ2PZW9nQhQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I just did a go install, after a clean, of the biggest binary I'm
> working on, using my pokey old mac laptop. It took 0.9 seconds, most
> of which was spent in 6l and not the go tool. It could be faster, but
> it's plenty fast enough.
>
> The public won't use mk or make. If you want to succeed in the world,
> you need to find a more modern way to build software. It's been clear
> for a long time that that is not a relevant criterion for this
> community any more, and although it makes me sad I have moved on.
>
> I regret responding to this thread, and will move on there, too.
>
> -rob
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [9fans] GCC
  2001-11-07 18:56 [9fans] Rant (was Re: Plan9 and Ada95?) David Gordon Hogan
@ 2001-11-08 14:45 ` suspect
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: suspect @ 2001-11-08 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, David Gordon Hogan wrote:
>
> No, it's a symptom of ``I wasted weeks of my life struggling
> with this awful code''.

Amidst all this clamor, I must ask: Why did you take the time to port
GCC ? Was it done under duress ?
-




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-24  2:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-24  2:45 [9fans] gcc Winston Kodogo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-07 18:56 [9fans] Rant (was Re: Plan9 and Ada95?) David Gordon Hogan
2001-11-08 14:45 ` [9fans] GCC suspect

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).