* [9fans] ipconfig @ 2001-07-13 9:31 Grunditz Mikael - migu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Grunditz Mikael - migu @ 2001-07-13 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu (E-mail) [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 218 bytes --] Does ip/ipconfig ether /dev/ether0 192.168.0.2 -g 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 give me an interface with 192.168.0.2 and with default gateway 192.168.0.1 ? Or how do I set my default gateway ? /Michael Grunditz [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 663 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] ipconfig @ 2001-07-13 12:53 presotto 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: presotto @ 2001-07-13 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 351 bytes --] The options have to happen before any of the ppsitional arguments. You really want ip/ipconfig -g 192.168.0.1 ether /dev/ether0 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0 Alternately, you could leave out the '-g 192.168.0.1' and just use echo -n 'add 0 0 192.168.0.1' > /net/iproute I think the ipconfig is easier but the other lets you change it later. [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2792 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 218 bytes --] Does ip/ipconfig ether /dev/ether0 192.168.0.2 -g 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 give me an interface with 192.168.0.2 and with default gateway 192.168.0.1 ? Or how do I set my default gateway ? /Michael Grunditz [-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 663 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] DHCP weirdness? @ 2003-04-24 16:24 David Presotto 2003-04-24 20:03 ` [9fans] ipconfig Sam 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Presotto @ 2003-04-24 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans I think rob saw this also. Could you send me the ip/ipconfig line that you're using. I changed it to fix arg processing and sysname defaulting (i.e. setting something useful in /net/ndb's sys= entry) but can't see what would have caused things to be completely ignored. All our systems run at boot. Perhaps I broke something for systems running ipconfig out of termrc. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [9fans] ipconfig 2003-04-24 16:24 [9fans] DHCP weirdness? David Presotto @ 2003-04-24 20:03 ` Sam 2003-04-24 20:56 ` David Presotto 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sam @ 2003-04-24 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Just to clarify this for me, is there any reason ipconfig needs to be in termrc for bootp'd terminals? I think our termrc has been around since 3rd ed which had ipconfig by default (iirc). If it's redundant I'd like to pull it. Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] ipconfig 2003-04-24 20:03 ` [9fans] ipconfig Sam @ 2003-04-24 20:56 ` David Presotto 2003-04-27 21:20 ` Russ Cox 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Presotto @ 2003-04-24 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 163 bytes --] 9load doesn't currently pass the IP address it got to the kernel Therefore, the booted kernel runs dhcp when it comes up (and can get more info than bootp does). [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1693 bytes --] From: Sam <sah@softcardsystems.com> To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: [9fans] ipconfig Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0304241556210.26650-100000@athena> Just to clarify this for me, is there any reason ipconfig needs to be in termrc for bootp'd terminals? I think our termrc has been around since 3rd ed which had ipconfig by default (iirc). If it's redundant I'd like to pull it. Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] ipconfig 2003-04-24 20:56 ` David Presotto @ 2003-04-27 21:20 ` Russ Cox 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Russ Cox @ 2003-04-27 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 255 bytes --] if booting with root from the network the kernel will run it using /ipconfig in order to dial the file server. it doesn't need to be in termrc. if you want a termrc that works in both places you can do if(! test -e /net/ipifc/0/ctl) ip/ipconfig [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3453 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 163 bytes --] 9load doesn't currently pass the IP address it got to the kernel Therefore, the booted kernel runs dhcp when it comes up (and can get more info than bootp does). [-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1693 bytes --] From: Sam <sah@softcardsystems.com> To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: [9fans] ipconfig Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0304241556210.26650-100000@athena> Just to clarify this for me, is there any reason ipconfig needs to be in termrc for bootp'd terminals? I think our termrc has been around since 3rd ed which had ipconfig by default (iirc). If it's redundant I'd like to pull it. Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-27 21:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-07-13 9:31 [9fans] ipconfig Grunditz Mikael - migu 2001-07-13 12:53 presotto 2003-04-24 16:24 [9fans] DHCP weirdness? David Presotto 2003-04-24 20:03 ` [9fans] ipconfig Sam 2003-04-24 20:56 ` David Presotto 2003-04-27 21:20 ` Russ Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).