* [9fans] sam -r
@ 2004-02-04 20:54 boyd, rounin
2004-02-05 9:49 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: boyd, rounin @ 2004-02-04 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
i think i worked out what the problem is; the remote,
running guess what? lunix.
i managed to sam -r boyd@sdgm.net and it worked fine.
i'll have a closer look when i get down to ENS again:
http://www.ens.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [9fans] sam -r
2004-02-04 20:54 [9fans] sam -r boyd, rounin
@ 2004-02-05 9:49 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Douglas A. Gwyn @ 2004-02-05 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Don't forget, the original sam protocol is flawed in
regard to terminating the (remote) connection, since
the host terminal handler can change mode and echo a
packet that hasn't yet arrived. Of course the echoed
characters screw up the local samterm. We fixed this
long ago in the BRL version of "sam", by adding one
extra handshake at the very end.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-05 9:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-04 20:54 [9fans] sam -r boyd, rounin
2004-02-05 9:49 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).